Gregory Szorc's blog

New Policy Chips Away at Freedom of Speech

I have just been directly informed by a residential assistant (RA) that the RA's have just been instructed to file incident reports (also known as writing up someone) if the RA overhears an individual using language that may be disrespectful towards homosexuals. I was led to believe that casual remarks, such as "that is gay" or "what a fag" are cause for action, even when they are not said in an intentionally hurtful manner. Although I will not defend the use of these remarks, I find this policy to be infringing on the rights of individuals to express themselves.

Because of the position many students are in (living in a private residence at a private institution), their constitutional right to freedom of speech does not protect them from this new rule (so I believe). However, just because the university can create rules and enforce punishments on those who break these rules, it does not mean that they should. How can institutions that take pride in allowing their members the freedom to expand academically and individually also sponsor a policy that limits the freedom of speech?

If the university has the power to punish those who say words that may be offensive, what is to stop them from expanding this power? Will they ban books on Communism? Will they write you up for cursing? Who knows what is next!

This policy is a step in the wrong direction. I hope individuals and groups, such as USG, will get involved and strongly recommend the repeal of this policy.

You can ping this entry by using http://blog.case.edu/gps10/mt-tb.cgi/5425 .

Hey Gregory,

You should report this here:
http://www.thefire.org/

There is a big difference between protecting free speech versus the use of harassing remarks (racial, sexual, etc.). I do not know the specifics of the policy but it sounds like the policy tries to address a very gray area of speech that can be interrupted either way. I hope many examples or simulation activities were used to instruct the RAs

In a work environment, these type of comments would probably be considered harassment even if not addressed at someone specific. Should someone's living environment be protected differently than their work environment? If offensive terminology is used, even in passing, is that real expanding people's minds academically?

Greg, I hope you keep everyone informed about the policy and the discussions that follow.

Since posting this entry, I have learned that other organizations around campus have become aware of the issue and recognize its implications. I have no doubt that these organizations will make themselves heard and the administration will be forced to listen. If I obtain a digital copy of this policy, unless strictly prohibited, I will post it in the public domain.

People sure like to get angry about stuff. How about this, you guys find some instances of when this has actually occured. While it's nice to not have extra meaningless policies, it is generally okay if they are not enforced to some ludicrous degree. Especially before you go emailing FIRE. And at least talk to the people in charge instead of believing everything you read in your email.

+C

indian trail ladder run indian hard

hard porn young girls porn

Record company EMI sign a deal with the estate of crooner Dean Martin to use the singer's likeness...