Another Disappointment
When I completed part II of my Learning Plan I was pretty confident that I had done everything in order to how it was suppose to have been done. But unexpectedly, after getting my part II back from Tracey Messer, there were comments everywhere. See basically tore apart everything I wrote trying to question every uncertainty that she somehow formulated. This is weird seeing that the goals are not hers, so she really needs to grade impartially, but it is evident that she didn't. She even wrote on the top of my paper that my goals don't apply to the SMART criteria. This is pretty funny to me seeing that when I wrote part II, I had the SMART goals paper and the grading criteria for part II in front of me, writing the goals to correspond with them. Then later in class, Prof. Powley tells the class that the Learning Plans can only be 15-16 pages maximum in length. This was frustrating but I laughed knowing that every person that I know had finished papers at about 20 pages. I am actually starting to wonder whether or not the professor and the TAs really know what they want out of these Learning Plans.
Comments