Frank Giglio: Cleveland's New Homeless
As if Cleveland didn't have enough of a homeless problem already, now they're making homeowners homeless. For their own good, of course.
Nobody is in the right here. Free Times has exposed Cimperman as a lying scumbag on the issue of Giglio's home. Nobody in their right mind doubts that this is part of a concerted effort to get Frank out. I have any number of homeowning friends whose houses would fail inspection on the same grounds as Frank's. If the Department of Building and Housing applied the same level and manner of enforcement to all of Cleveland, they could probably knock the population figures down to 5 digits.
On the other hand, Frank is a pig. Worse, he is a pig who has defended his piggishness on the religious grounds of being a Neo-pagan, which I personally resent.
But he's a pig who owns his own sty. That's the main issue. By what right does a city remove a man from his own home? And why in Goddess' name would anyone buy real estate in a city where such things were condoned?
Comments
Posted by: Gary
Posted on: December 19, 2008 04:29 PM
What do you do wit the guy though? The city bulldozed his yard twice and the guy refuses to prevent himself from being an eyesore. The city is also in wrong. They should of charged him for bulldozing the yard, billed him & when he didnt pay lien the property for the value of the bill then initiate a foreclosure. THEN demolish the home. Atleast let due process prevail.
Posted by: Jeffrey Quick
Posted on: December 20, 2008 05:11 AM
What do I do with the guy? Nothing. You seem to think that you have a "right" not to see certain things. Well, there's no right to a gorgeous landscape at your neighbor's expense. If Frank was as much of a problem as you think, then the neighbors should have banded together and bought him out. They've got the same BS going on in Kent over temporary signs.