Why we're losing our freedom
This poll from WorldNetDaily says it all:
Should Rep.-elect Keith Ellison be seated in the upcoming Congress?No, he'd be unable to uphold an oath to the U.S. Constitution, since Muslims put the Quran first 43.98% (1601)
No, Congress needs to do the right thing for American security and block his seating 26.84% (977)
No, he's unfit for office due to his links with the Nation of Islam 9.23% (336)
Yes, he was elected by Americans. Why is this question even being asked? 5.66% (206)
Yes, there is still no religion test in the Constitution 4.70% (171)
Only if he takes his oath on the Bible 4.51% (164)
No, in a post-9/11 world, it is obvious he shouldn't be seated 2.91% (106)
Only if he doesn't take his oath on Quran 1.10% (40)
Other 1.04% (38)
Yes, there are millions of Muslims who deserve representation 0.03% (1)
In summary, 88.6% of 3640 respondents think the Constitution is a "goddamned piece of paper" (as their Fearless Leader is alleged to have said). And don't go on about the inaccuracy of Internet polls...you actually have to register for WND's polls, so they're more likely to reflect actual readership. The Red Team allegedly supports the Constitution, remember? And for even one to vote for not seating a legally-elected Congressman on the basis of religion...well, it explains the past five years, doesn't it?
(For the Constitutionally-challenged, #5 is the correct answer, though I counted #4,9 and 10 as acceptable.)
Comments