Unity '08
A friend alerted me to these folks, who seem to think they will save American democracy from polarization and partisanship.
Pardon me, but this is a crock.
First, there is no center in American politics. The duopoly parties actually have fairly clearly-demarcated positions: the Democrats want to control your money, the Republicans want to control your body. The "center" is control, and when we have a fairly centrist government like that of the "compassionate conservative", we get control of both bodies and money. And the electorate reacts against either form of control, depending on their mood, by voting for the other form of control. Both parties belong on the sinister side of the American political spacial metaphor...with even the theocratic Constitution Party to the right, the Libertarians farther on, and with anarchy as the terminus. (the terminus of the left would be de jure slavery, I suppose.)
They correctly diagnose the problem and opportunity: utter disgust. NOT ONE of the mooted duopoly candidates can unify the country. So what's their solution? Have the citizens pick a candidate over the Internet. The candidate has to pick a running mate from the other party (Independents have to pick one from one other party, and give the left-out party a cabinet post). So this was "everyone will win", see? They don't hate the parties; they just want to issue a wakeup call. And who is reponsible for this inew idea? Political operatives -- the same bunch of people who gifted us with the dysfunction we have.
If I had time on my hands and were fonder of conspiracy theories than I am, I'm be looking for membership in the CFR, people getting Soros money, and other establishment ties. What this smells like to me is an attempt to co-opt third-party activity by establishing a third non-party, so you don't have to vote for vanilla or chocolate, but can have TWIST instead...the same old product, full of high fructose corn syrup and soy phytoestrogens, but with a new flavor. (I don't see anything new, or very definite, in their platform.) If this movement became extremely popular, they could get citizens to insist on removing the current 3rd-party barriers (Under current law, their plan to nominate after the Big 2 conventions is just not going to fly), which would be good for real 3rd party. But a group that powerful would become a de-facto first-and-only party. And nothing will change.
Comments
Posted by: Ottobock
Posted on: June 24, 2007 12:27 PM
A third party needs to speak of the Fed Reserve and it's crime of the century stealing of silver and gold, and fiat currency printed by the House of Rothchild and orher international bankers and how the evil crooks demonize any country that doesn't accept them as a central banker so they can keep the ountry in debt for control. A third party needs to point out the internationl banking system is why the US has a 9 trillion dollar debt.
A third party also needs to point out all the leaders that have made multiple millions off the war and that we only went into Afghanistan to make a deal with the Taliban to control the opium trade which the Afghans produce 70% of the worlds supply. Also so Union 76 could build a pipeline to the Caspian Sea. Now the Taliban is back in power.
A third party could do more exposing these crimes than by just running. If the coruption doesn't change 4 years later,run again, emind everyone of the cirruption and speak of what the party will actually do. If the Unity party can't garner enugh votes they can always expose the corrupt elction process(see Greg Palast).
Now if the Unity party doesn't expose the fact that the internaional banking cartel is ushering in the North American Union, they won't serve much purpose. Is this just a ploy by the controlled election process to ensure even further that Hillary wins? That was the assertion of Ross Perot's attempt and the main reason that was given for Clinton's first term win.
In conclusion, the only good the third party could do is expose corruption but the paradoxis that same corruption is the same reason they can't make it to the White House so may as well expose as much as possible in an attempt to fix all that is severely broken. Unfortunately, just as Kennedy was shot because he tried exposing the trend setting unconstitutional CFR and other even more secret societies, the whistleblower will not only be marginalized but possibly taken out by a Manchurian candidate. The above would just be a starting point. As Mike Bloomberg said, America is in deep trouble.
Posted by: RAS1142
Posted on: October 24, 2007 05:13 AM
IF YOU GO TO UNITY 08'S SITE AND LOOK UP COUNSEL MEMBERS, YOU SEE AT THE TOP OF LIST IS PETE ACKENMAN
CHAIRMAN, ALSO IS CHAIRMAN OF FREEDOM HOUSE. NOW FREEDOM HOUSE IS A FRONT FOR THE CFR TC GLOBAL ELITE AND THE WORLD BANK. SO UNITY 08 IS GOING TO FOLLOW THE CFR,TC GLOBALISTS AGENDA, AND WE KNOW WHAT THAT IS OPEN BORDERS AND THE FORMATION OF THE NORTH AMERICAN UNION. ITS JUST A ANOTHER FORM OF CONTROL , AND TO COVER ALL THE BASES. LOOK ALL THE TOP TIER CANDIDATES FROM BOTH PARTY'S ARE EITHER CFR MEMBERS OR ARE FUNDED BY THE TC GLOBAL ELITE,
THE GLOBALISTS HAVE GET ONE OF THEIR PLAYER'S IN OFFICE AND THEY WILL STOP AT NOTHING TO COMPLETE THEIR AGENDA.