Today's dilemma: Do I want my future research/career to have a human component? Specifically, should I do an MPhil in Quaternary Science or an MPhil by research thesis at Cambridge?

Do I want to study the Earth, just the Earth, and work on things like paleoclimate reconstruction? Understanding the Earth system ... past, present, and perhaps future?

Or, do I want my work to bridge the divide between science and policy? To include the human factor in the equation, and do work that has a more direct impact on people's relationship with the environment?

In short, do I want to go the hard-core science track or the more political environmental policy track? Can I do both?

I've just been offered a full scholarship to Cambridge University next year. For the past few days I have been absolutely over the moon with happiness (although the scholarship doesn't mean I am officially admitted to the University yet ... it's a confusing proecess). I applied for an MPhil in Quaternary Science (like a masters degree) in the Geography department, but the Cambridge professors I have been emailing with are encouraging me to switch to the MPhil by Research thesis option, offered in the Earth Sciences department.

I have a technical, scientific background, and already have some experience with research. One prof suggested to me that the QS courses would be a review for me, and that working on a research thesis would teach me much more.

I'm torn.

On one hand, I love working on my senior thesis project. I learn more figuring things out in my lab and talking with my advisor than I do in class. I think doing a more intense research project at Cambridge would give me lots of great technical skills and experience ... maybe even produce a paper. On the other hand, I want to take advantage of the classes they offer, to learn about Quaternary Science from a different point of view (that of a geographer's?), to interact with more students, etc. Some profs I've talked to think that geography is "touchy-feely" ... but I think that the human factor is crucial to any modern climate/environmental work, and is fascinating in its own right. It all comes down to: do I want to spend time in the Earth Sciences dept. or the Geography dept.? I don't know much about how they are different at Cambridge, so now I am trying to do some research ... to find out what kinds of papers they are publishing, and figuring out which is a better fit for me. The problem is ... to figure out where is best for me, I need to know what my goals are.

More to come on this later ...


Trackback URL for this entry is:


Post a comment

If you have entered an email address in the box, clicking this checkbox will subscribe your email address to this entry so that you are notified if any updates or additional comments occur on the entry.