Jonah Creighton Case
The Jonah Creighton case is very interesting. At first, I thought the answer was so simple. It was clear that the Coulding-Henson Company needed some kind of anti-discrimination program. However, when analyzing the case, it is apparent that the case is not so simple. Jonah needs to consider his own actions and the effects he is making on the company. Jonah should not have been so accusatory towards his supervisor. Jonah also has to consider how his actions affect him. He is jeopardizing his own career and the success of his own team. I was surprised at the complexity and delicacy of the issue the case brings up.
Comments
Posted by: Beau
Posted on: November 10, 2006 11:42 PM
I agree that Jonah needed to consider his own actions when pursuit for equal opportunity. Not only did he jeopardize his career, but he made a comment to CHAMP participants that he did not follow him self. I believe his comment was that this company is not about self growth, but making a profit. If Jonah wanted to stay true and consider his actions we would have not put so much time into fighting discrimination within Coulding-Henson.