Incident M
In the HR simulation project, there was an interesting part of Incident M that I would like to point out. It said in the incident description that the HR director was going to “confront him [Ted] with sexual harassment charges” for asking Chris to accompany him to a two-day technical conference. Now Ted asking Chris to accompany him on the two-day trip was not professional and was one of the reasons we decided to fire him. However, this does not necessarily mean that his plans for Chris at the conference were necessarily sexual even though they probably were. I do not think that the HR director should have confronted Ted with sexual harassment charges without exactly knowing his intentions. Instead, he should have confronted him with the fact that he offered Chris a bribe, and changed her work assignments and gave her poor reviews when she refused to go to the conference.
Comments