April 2009 Meeting Notes
Notes from the 2009 April DMS Meeting:
1. Tom Sanville
Future meetings at state library
2. 856/956 conversion
Records currently with 856 that need to be changed to 956. Suppress the record, edit it, then recontribute the record. Bring records in as "s" or "z". OCLC
looks at 9xx fields as locally defined. Make sure loader doesn't strip out 9xx's.
Suggestion: get rid of BCODE3="g" first. You could see what's happening with records in central, but you lose functionality of g
Change g to z
global update, insert 945, and take g out.
FirstSearch, etc. do not have RAv url's.
ABC-CLIO are _not_ OLINK
At Wright State, item records are made for all e-resources.
JSTOR 956's.
EJC. print records should not have "g" in first place.
RAVE URL -- proxy for OLINK.
Schedule with Anita flipping 956's.
Action item: Gather g's, convert to dashes (-). Instructions will be sent out to show people how to do this.
Then, 856/956 conversions will be scheduled.
Action item: Do NOT use "g" for new records.
3. Contribution of non-OCLC records; standardizing 001s
Means to avoid several different versions of same record.
035's must be moved to 001, if 035 is used.
For those that don't have load profile training
Add "1" in MarcEdit, before prefixes.
Add "1" for all non-OCLC records.
To contribute to central...
Look for Meg Spernoga e-mail with spreadsheet
Should be done retrospectively
Do not overlay non-OCLC with OCLC record
EBSCO files. Not locally loaded (??).
4. ETD
add gmd
245 $[electronic resource]
etc. etc.
add advisor? [79x] field
653 student supplied keywords, not LCSH
http://platinum.ohiolink.edu/dms/catstandards/etd.pdf
5. Chadwyck-Healey Cataloging
6. Naxos Cataloging
OCLC has given up on keeping up on new releases from Naxos
240 records in a year
7. Survey for inventory of cataloging expertise
Kent State. in progress.
8. NACO
Training already took place at Kent State.
OSU.
e-mail B. Strauss by Friday what from Tech Services has to be done locally.
rush cataloging
DVDs, VHS
special collections material
metadata work
stack maintenance
Comments