The four stages of life: Stage 4 – sannyasin

The final stage of life in Hindu philosophy (as described in the book The World's Religions by Huston Smith, and all quotes are from this book) is that of the sannyasin. This is the stage eventually arrived at by the person who, according to the Bhagavad-Gita becomes "one who neither hates nor loves anything." (For descriptions of earlier stages, see stage 1, stage 2, and stage 3.)

Once having arrived at this stage of detachment from the world, the retiree returns from the self-imposed exile that was necessary in order to free oneself from worldly distractions so that one could achieve this deeper understanding. But returning to the world does not mean returning to the familiar bonds of the world. He or she "is back as a separate person" because "time and place have lost their hold."

"Far from wanting to "be somebody", the sannyasin's wish is the opposite: to remain a complete nonentity on the surface in order to be joined to all at the root…The outward life that fits this total freedom best is that of a homeless mendicant. Others seek to be economically independent in their old age: the sannyasin proposes to cut free of economics altogether. With no fixed place on earth, no obligations, no goals, no belongings, the expectations of the body are nothing. Social pretensions likewise have no soil from which to sprout and interfere. No pride remains in someone who, begging bowl in hand, finds himself at the back door of someone who was once his servant and would not have it otherwise."

If the idea of retirement as leaving all that one has created in order to find oneself is hard to take, the idea of ending one's life as effectively a beggar is even more difficult to accept. Part of the problem is that the word 'mendicant' properly means a holy person who begs just for food, and such people are more commonly found in predominantly Hindu or Buddhist cultures, where they are highly respected as having reached an exalted stage in life that everyone should aspire to. It is an honor to have such people come to your house asking for food and people respect them and are supposed to take care of them.

In the west though, the word mendicant is equated with beggar and such people tend to be despised as wastrels and losers. So it is hard to see this idea of becoming sannyasin catching on here. One cannot imagine people who are important figures in society here choosing to end their lives wandering the streets, living on charity. A sannyasin who arrived at someone's door asking for food is likely to find the police being called and be arrested for vagrancy.

But is that a problem with the philosophy or with the way the society creates its value structure?

Trackbacks

Trackback URL for this entry is: http://blog.case.edu/mxs24/mt-tb.cgi/968 The four stages of life: some closing reflections
Excerpt: While the stages of student and householder described in Hindu philosophy may not be that different from the way we...
Weblog: Mano Singham's Web Journal
Tracked: April 11, 2005 08:13 AM

Comments

Mano, I really enjoyed your writings on the 4 stages - We are taught in this western society that to reach success/enlightment/knowledge etc. it is an act of addition (adding from the outside in), via formal education, books/people, structured religion, etc. Yet it seems many eastern societies seem to teach the opposite, that it's an act of subtraction (removing from the inside out) via meditation, solitude, looking inward to find true enlightment (the kingdom) within.
This is facinating to me. Do we have to go through the first 2 stages, only to undo them at stages 3 & 4. Is it possible to skip the first 2 and go straight to stages 3 & 4 (a lot less undoing). Or is it the process of going through the first 2 stages that make the last 2 stages possible. I think of zen monks (and other monastic followers) who seem to attempt to do this. Does your source comment on this question?

Posted by Mary on April 7, 2005 05:42 PM

I don't think that the first two stages are considered bad in themselves, at leasat in Hinduism. In fact, the experiences we have in those first two stages may actually help us to acheve the enlightenment.

Buddhism is different. It also, like Hinduism, sees value in detachment but it encourages it from the get-go, so people renounce the world and become monks in childhood. Some people do become monks later in life but that is not the norm.

It is interesting though that the Buddha was, of course, born a Hindu prince and lived a very worldly life before renouncing those pleasures to seek enlightenment, so he followed the four stages, although his followers do seem to skip directly to 3 and 4.

We really need Hindu and Buddhist theologians to help us out here! I'll see if I can get someof my colleagues in the Religion department to contribute.

Posted by Mano Singham on April 7, 2005 06:32 PM

Professor Singham,

I very much enjoyed this series of writings, and the insight into a Hindu perspective on life it gave me.

The idea of the 4-stage life cycle is particularly interesting because I find that in many respects it parallels Chinese philosophy. Particularly so in regards to the 'student' phase of life.

Posted by Derlen on April 8, 2005 01:22 PM

Mano,

I enjoy your blog and read it regularly. Thank you for raising all our consciousness around so many critical issues.

I am not a theologian but couldn't pass by an opportunity to think aloud on such an interesting discussion about Buddhism and Hinduism. Since my reply grew kind of long, I decided to post it on my journal. Check out:

http://www.livejournal.com/users/scholarmama/1571.html

Cheers

Latha

Posted by Latha on April 9, 2005 10:29 AM

Post a comment