Fast prediction of axon behavior
Modeling method speeds analysis from weeks to seconds
Researchers at Case Western Reserve University have developed a computer modeling method to accurately predict how a peripheral nerve axon responds to electrical stimuli, slashing the complex work from an inhibitory weeks-long process to just a few seconds.
The method, which enables efficient evaluation of a nerve’s response to millions of electrode designs, is an integral step toward building more accurate and capable electrodes to stimulate nerves and thereby enable people with paralysis or amputated limbs better control of movement.
To increase the accuracy of the results, the researchers included a key parameter overlooked in past mathematical approaches that were equally fast, but inaccurate. With the new techniques, electrode design can be optimized using advanced algorithms based on natural genetics.
An explanation of the work, which the team hopes others in the field will freely use, and a second method that was simpler and faster but proved less effective, are now available online in the Journal of Neural Engineering.
“We believe this will allow the next generation of computer-aided development of electrodes,” said Dustin Tyler, associate professor of biomedical engineering at Case School of Engineering and senior author of the paper.
Since his graduate school days, Tyler has been developing electrodes to stimulate nerves in paralyzed patients and amputees. Taking the large step from animal models to human clinical trials can be improved with better computer modeling, he said.
“Finding the optimal way to stimulate a nerve is kind of like the ‘travelling salesman’ trying to figure out which is the most efficient route through a group of cities,” Tyler said.
Mapping each possible route and figuring the time spent on the road is very difficult to do with a simple equation.
But, using a complex mathematical formula called a genetic algorithm to simultaneously consider all the routes, or in Tyler’s predicament electrode designs, and determining the best requires that each design be evaluated in fractions of seconds. This was not possible previously.
The genetic algorithm mimics the process of natural selection, gene recombination and mutation seen in nature. Or, in this case, takes into account which portions of a neuron to stimulate, how much, with how many points of contact, and more variables.
By adding a variable: the magnitude of the voltage outside the cell produced by the electrode, Tyler’s group raised the accuracy beyond current techniques.
They used the free-online nerve simulation environment NEURON developed at Yale University. The data the team used is included in the supplemental materials of their paper and may be downloaded for free, said Erik Petersen, a PhD student at Case Western Reserve and lead author. The second author is Olivier Izad, who initiated the investigation while a master’s student in Tyler’s lab.
Their method was developed specifically for peripheral motor nerve axons. Nerves cells with different structures, such as those in the brain, spinal cord, or organs are still being investigated.
The researchers are now developing parameters that would take into account these variations in structure to extend the method to work for all of them, further cutting time needed to develop accurate models.