<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/topics-files/atom2xhtml.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<!-- This is a 512 byte XML comment that one must put into XML Atom feeds
such that browsers like Firefox 2.0 and IE7 will obey the XSL stylesheet.
Everybody hates overbearing browsers.
This is a 512 byte XML comment that one must put into XML Atom feeds
such that browsers like Firefox 2.0 and IE7 will obey the XSL stylesheet.
Everybody hates overbearing browsers.
This is a 512 byte XML comment that one must put into XML Atom feeds
such that browsers like Firefox 2.0 and IE7 will obey the XSL stylesheet.
Everybody hates overbearing browsers.
This is a 512 byte XML comment that one must put into XML Atom feeds
such that browsers like Firefox 2.0 and IE7 will obey the XSL stylesheet.
Everybody hates overbearing browsers.
This is a 512 byte XML comment that one must put into XML Atom feeds
such that browsers like Firefox 2.0 and IE7 will obey the XSL stylesheet.
Everybody hates overbearing browsers.
This is a 512 byte XML comment that one must put into XML Atom feeds
such that browsers like Firefox 2.0 and IE7 will obey the XSL stylesheet.
Everybody hates overbearing browsers. -->
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
><title
>Blog@Case Topics: TV</title
><link rel="self" href="http://blog.case.edu/topics/TV"
 /><id
>http://blog.case.edu/topics/TV</id
><category term="TV" label="TV"
 /><link rel="related" href="http://blog.case.edu/topics/tv" title="tv"
 /><link rel="related" href="http://blog.case.edu/topics/movies" title="movies"
 /><link rel="related" href="http://blog.case.edu/topics/video%20games" title="video games"
 /><link rel="related" href="http://blog.case.edu/topics/podcasts" title="podcasts"
 /><link rel="related" href="http://blog.case.edu/topics/mad%20men" title="mad men"
 /><link rel="related" href="http://blog.case.edu/topics/podcast" title="podcast"
 /><link rel="related" href="http://blog.case.edu/topics/the%20office" title="the office"
 /><link rel="related" href="http://blog.case.edu/topics/the%20amazing%20race" title="the amazing race"
 /><link rel="related" href="http://blog.case.edu/topics/30%20rock" title="30 rock"
 /><link rel="related" href="http://blog.case.edu/topics/floating%20around%20the%20'net" title="floating around the 'net"
 /><link rel="related" href="http://blog.case.edu/topics/lost" title="lost"
 /><contributor
><name
>Nicholas Kosareo</name
><email
>nicholas.kosareo@case.edu</email
><uri
>http://blog.case.edu/kosareo</uri
></contributor
><contributor
><name
>Erin Wolverton</name
><email
>erin.wolverton@case.edu</email
><uri
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal</uri
></contributor
><updated
>2007-05-13T21:04:11Z</updated
><entry
><title
>New digs</title
><link href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/05/19/new_digs"
 /><id
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/05/19/new_digs</id
><published
>2010-05-20T02:48:48Z</published
><updated
>2010-10-03T21:21:27Z</updated
><category term="TV" label="TV"
 /><category term="lost" label="lost"
 /><category term="site stuff" label="site stuff"
 /><content type="xhtml"
><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
>
<img alt="large_lost-follow-the-leader.jpg" src="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/05/19/large_lost-follow-the-leader.jpg" width="453" height="299" /> 
<small>
<em>"Stop all this arguing! We have to keep moving!"</em> - every episode of 
<em>Lost</em>, ever</small> It's time to abandon Cereal Monogamist and head off into the jungle in the direction of my new blog, 
<a href="http://culturalcivilian.wordpress.com/">Cultural Civilian</a>. Follow me (or my helpful link) to my new presence at Wordpress. (And for God's sake, keep moving! They could be right behind us. And it's gonna be dark soon.)</div
></content
><author
><name
>Erin Wolverton</name
><email
>erin.wolverton@case.edu</email
><uri
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal</uri
></author
></entry
><entry
><title
>The Great X-Files Rewatch: Season One, Part Two</title
><link href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/05/17/the_great_xfiles_rewatch_season_one_part_two"
 /><id
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/05/17/the_great_xfiles_rewatch_season_one_part_two</id
><published
>2010-05-17T18:55:03Z</published
><updated
>2010-10-03T21:23:11Z</updated
><category term="TV" label="TV"
 /><category term="a.d. skinner" label="a.d. skinner"
 /><category term="dana scully" label="dana scully"
 /><category term="david duchovny" label="david duchovny"
 /><category term="fox mulder" label="fox mulder"
 /><category term="gillian anderson" label="gillian anderson"
 /><category term="house" label="house"
 /><category term="mitch pileggi" label="mitch pileggi"
 /><category term="supernatural" label="supernatural"
 /><category term="the x-files" label="the x-files"
 /><content type="xhtml"
><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
>
<img alt="mulder and scully first season.jpg" src="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/05/17/mulder%20and%20scully%20first%20season.jpg" width="369" height="277" /> 
<strong>Initial Thoughts</strong> One big bonus of the second half of the first season of 
<em>The X-Files</em>: the introduction of Assistant Director Skinner! 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0683379/">The Skinman</a>! He only appears in one episode (&#226;&#8364;&#339;Tooms&#226;&#8364;), but apparently he made enough of an impression that he became a regular starting with Season Two. And this is back when we were all supposed to haaaaaaaaate Skinner. See, Skinner 
<em>eventually</em> becomes Mulder and Scully&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s ally, in an awesome moment where he told the Cigarette Smoking Man to &#226;&#8364;&#339;bend over and kiss my ass,&#226;&#8364; but before that happens, he&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s in league with the mysteriously oppressive government forces. Another big bonus of the second half of the first season: Scully Pregnancy Watch! Yes, Gillian Anderson managed to get herself knocked up in the first year of the show, leaving her costumers with little else to do but drape her in mannish suits and an enormous trenchcoat that becomes omnipresent at the tail end of the season. 
<img alt="pregnant Scully.jpg" src="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/05/17/pregnant%20Scully.jpg" width="339" height="254" /> 
<small>
<em>"Scully, do you have something to tell me?"</em>
</small> 
<small>
<em>"No, Mulder, why do you ask?"</em>
</small> Brilliantly, the show wrote around it by having Scully be abducted by aliens in the first part of season 2.</div
></content
><author
><name
>Erin Wolverton</name
><email
>erin.wolverton@case.edu</email
><uri
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal</uri
></author
></entry
><entry
><title
>The News in Feisty Old Ladies</title
><link href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/05/07/the_news_in_feisty_old_ladies"
 /><id
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/05/07/the_news_in_feisty_old_ladies</id
><published
>2010-05-07T16:24:17Z</published
><updated
>2010-10-03T21:26:10Z</updated
><category term="TV" label="TV"
 /><category term="betty white" label="betty white"
 /><category term="jimmy fallon" label="jimmy fallon"
 /><category term="saturday night live" label="saturday night live"
 /><content type="xhtml"
><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
>
<object width="512" height="296">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.hulu.com/embed/d9bVLwgijl9x8u4p1pfU6w" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed src="http://www.hulu.com/embed/d9bVLwgijl9x8u4p1pfU6w" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="512" height="296" />
</object>Betty White will be hosting 
<em>Saturday Night Live</em> tomorrow, and if her interview with Jimmy Fallon is any indication, she's going to rock it. Everyone needs to watch this NOW.</div
></content
><author
><name
>Erin Wolverton</name
><email
>erin.wolverton@case.edu</email
><uri
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal</uri
></author
></entry
><entry
><title
>Liberal crisis!</title
><link href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/05/03/liberal_crisis"
 /><id
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/05/03/liberal_crisis</id
><published
>2010-05-03T18:12:00Z</published
><updated
>2010-10-03T23:43:39Z</updated
><category term="TV" label="TV"
 /><category term="barbara ehrenreich" label="barbara ehrenreich"
 /><category term="issues" label="issues"
 /><category term="nickel and dimed" label="nickel and dimed"
 /><category term="the x-files" label="the x-files"
 /><category term="wal-mart" label="wal-mart"
 /><category term="wal-mart watch" label="wal-mart watch"
 /><content type="xhtml"
><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
>
<img alt="TV.jpg" src="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/05/03/TV.jpg" width="215" height="215" /> I want to buy a new TV&#226;&#8364;&#8221;a small one, for my bedroom, so that I can move the one that&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s currently in my bedroom into my kitchen. I&#226;&#8364;&#8482;ve decided this is a necessity based on the fact that ever since 
<a href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/04/14/trouble_brewing">I discovered 
<em>The X-Files</em> was on Netflix Watch Instantly</a>, and that my laptop fits very nicely on a corner of my kitchen counter, my dirty dishes have been cleaned much more regularly. (While I&#226;&#8364;&#8482;m still locked into finals, my deal is that I&#226;&#8364;&#8482;m only allowed to watch 
<em>The X-Files</em> if I&#226;&#8364;&#8482;m also cleaning the kitchen. See how my mind works? I have to trick myself into doing things like I&#226;&#8364;&#8482;m a kindergartner.) Anyway, I was looking at various online deals, when I suddenly had a guilty little urge to check Wal-Mart. I don&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t shop at Wal-Mart. I have been indoctrinated to think Wal-Mart is terrible. I know that everything in there is way cheaper than you will get it anywhere else, but I also know WHY that is&#226;&#8364;&#8221;price gouging and cheating their employees out of health insurance are their main strategies, but, of course, there&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s a lot more unnecessarily evil things they are doing. I ran the search on TVs, and now I have to sit here and know that they have 
<a href="http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.do?product_id=13028050">this well-reviewed 19 inch Sharp</a> for about 75% of what other stores are charging for similar products. I want to show integrity and not buy my cheap TV off the backs of the working poor. But I&#226;&#8364;&#8482;M poor! I&#226;&#8364;&#8482;m a soon-to-be-unemployed grad student! I hem and haw about whether I really need to buy the name-brand cheese or not! But&#226;&#8364;&#166;
<a href="http://walmartwatch.com/">Wal-Mart Watch</a>! 
<a href="http://www.wikisummaries.org/Nickel_and_Dimed#Chapter_3:_Selling_in_Minnesota">
<em>Nickel and Dimed</em>
</a>! Now I feel bad for wanting the extra TV at all.</div
></content
><author
><name
>Erin Wolverton</name
><email
>erin.wolverton@case.edu</email
><uri
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal</uri
></author
></entry
><entry
><title
>The Great X-Files Rewatch: Season One, Part One</title
><link href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/04/30/the_great_xfiles_rewatch_season_one_part_one"
 /><id
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/04/30/the_great_xfiles_rewatch_season_one_part_one</id
><published
>2010-04-30T05:11:57Z</published
><updated
>2010-10-03T23:44:59Z</updated
><category term="TV" label="TV"
 /><category term="bania" label="bania"
 /><category term="brad dourif" label="brad dourif"
 /><category term="cars" label="cars"
 /><category term="david duchovny" label="david duchovny"
 /><category term="felicity huffman" label="felicity huffman"
 /><category term="gillian anderson" label="gillian anderson"
 /><category term="technology" label="technology"
 /><category term="the x-files" label="the x-files"
 /><category term="xander berkeley" label="xander berkeley"
 /><content type="xhtml"
><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
>
<img alt="x files season 1.jpg" src="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/04/30/x%20files%20season%201.jpg" width="320" height="221" /> 
<strong>Initial Thoughts</strong> So I&#226;&#8364;&#8482;m about halfway through the first season of 
<em>The X-Files</em> right now. (If my academic work were finished I would probably be done with the whole series at this point. Right now I&#226;&#8364;&#8482;m basically on an episode reward system and plodding slowly through.) Though something like seventeen years has passed since the first season of this show (1993, people) it&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s only been around five or six years since I&#226;&#8364;&#8482;ve seen it. At that time, the show was in pretty regular rotation on SciFi and TNT, and I watched all the time. (Specifically, I think that episodes aired at 5 and 6pm on weekdays, and that I watched them when I got home from work. Foolproof way to get me hooked on a show is to air it in syndication at such a convenient evening hour.) Still, the first thing that struck me on this rewatch was the passage of time. Why? Notably because Season One is 
<em>pre-internet</em>. Not only are Mulder and Scully carrying and trading around like, manila file folders with all their research and evidence in them, but the research and evidence is compiled via microform readers! You know those things? They&#226;&#8364;&#8482;re teeny-teeny photos of old texts (like newspapers) which you thread into this thing, and it magnifies the image, and you turn a knob to turn pages and scan through the information that way. I have only done this once in my life; I found it fussy and headache-inducing. I imagine people who were in grad school as recently as 10 years ago used to do this almost every day. Anyway, Mulder and Scully are microform experts; they rock the archival research. They also record witness interviews on cassette tape. They still communicate via cell phone, but the phones are preciously large. Not quite reaching 
<a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Zack%20Morris%20phone">Zack Morris brick phone proportions</a>, but &#226;&#8364;&#166; The other extra-special blast from the past occurs in the second-ever episode, "Deep Throat." Mulder and Scully drove many rental cars of many makes and models over the years, but in this episode, they drive the same car I drove throughout college: a tan Cutlass Ciera. Look at 'em go! 
<img alt="cutlass resized 1.jpg" src="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/04/30/cutlass%20resized%201.jpg" width="369" height="260" /> 
<img alt="cutlass resized 2.jpg" src="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/04/30/cutlass%20resized%202.jpg" width="336" height="236" /> Click ahead for more about Scully's clothes, Duchovny's acting, and that blasted myth-arc.</div
></content
><author
><name
>Erin Wolverton</name
><email
>erin.wolverton@case.edu</email
><uri
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal</uri
></author
></entry
><entry
><title
>Life-Changing Art</title
><link href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/04/17/lifechanging_art"
 /><id
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/04/17/lifechanging_art</id
><published
>2010-04-17T17:23:11Z</published
><updated
>2010-10-03T23:49:09Z</updated
><category term="TV" label="TV"
 /><category term="ang lee" label="ang lee"
 /><category term="arrested development" label="arrested development"
 /><category term="books" label="books"
 /><category term="flannery o'connor" label="flannery o'connor"
 /><category term="high school" label="high school"
 /><category term="movies" label="movies"
 /><category term="pulp fiction" label="pulp fiction"
 /><category term="sense and sensibility" label="sense and sensibility"
 /><category term="the av club" label="the av club"
 /><category term="the philadelphia story" label="the philadelphia story"
 /><content type="xhtml"
><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
>This morning, I was reading a fun story over at the AV Club: 
<a href="http://www.avclub.com/articles/lifechanging-art,40183/">Life-Changing Art</a> Some of the blog writers talk about works of literature, film, and art that changed their tastes fundamentally&#226;&#8364;&#8221;that made them say, &#226;&#8364;&#339;if a movie can do 
<em>this</em>, how can I be satisfied with a movie that does less?&#226;&#8364; and so on. And I have a few of those: 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0032904/">
<em>The Philadelphia Story</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0374515360/comfortsofhome/">Flannery O'Connor</a>, 
<a href="http://www.hulu.com/arrested-development">
<em>Arrested Development</em>
</a>. But somehow, my immediate reaction to this question was to remember my experience with Ang Lee&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0114388/">
<em>Sense and Sensibility</em>
</a>. 
<img alt="sense and sensibility.jpg" src="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/04/17/sense%20and%20sensibility.jpg" width="438" height="246" /> It came out in 1995, when I was a freshman in high school. Even though I was already mostly an oddball, not interested in skating along with what was popular or cool, at fourteen I was still feeling a selective kind of peer pressure. I had my small group of friends, and I believed that my tastes needed to be in line with theirs. If I took a step in a direction they didn&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t agree with&#226;&#8364;&#8221;well, they would drop me like a hot potato, wouldn&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t they? When you&#226;&#8364;&#8482;re fourteen and everyone around you allies themselves based on shared tastes, liking the wrong thing is fatal. The logic is unimpeachable, so long as you haven&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t lived to know better. So anyway, one day I was watching TV with Jamie, my best friend at the time. A commercial came on for 
<em>Sense and Sensibility</em>, and it was all British, and full of straw hats and gowns and fancy dancing. Please be aware that this was 
<em>Pulp Fiction</em> times. Absolute baseline requirement for coolness at the time was subversion&#226;&#8364;&#8221;drugs and violence and swearing, the harsh, the crude, the angry. (I&#226;&#8364;&#8482;m talking of course about popular culture, because in our own lives we were totally suburban honor students.) And Jamie scoffed at the commercial, because Jane Austen was clearly a tool of The Man. Any movie you could see with your mom was officially lame. As it happened, I had seen 
<em>Sense and Sensibility</em> with my mom, and I had dug it immensely. And at that moment, all my teenage frustration and righteous anger&#226;&#8364;&#8221;and outright exhaustion with the effort of trying to keep up with who and what I was supposed to be&#226;&#8364;&#8221;overcame me, and do you know what I said? &#226;&#8364;&#339;I loved it. And I bought the book, and I&#226;&#8364;&#8482;m going to read it.&#226;&#8364; I didn&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t hedge, I didn&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t hesitate, I may have said it in the timid mouse-voice I was mostly using at the time, but damn if it didn&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t feel monumental. And Jamie? She considered for a moment, then shrugged and said, &#226;&#8364;&#339;That&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s cool.&#226;&#8364; And thus it started. Half my lifetime ago I came to a realization: if I 
<em>like</em> something, that&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s justification enough to like it! In fact, it&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s 
<em>cool</em> of me to be 
<em>sincere</em> about what I 
<em>feel!</em> It shows strength, and people respect it! And never again have I apologized for liking anything. My tastes&#226;&#8364;&#8221;broad and diverse&#226;&#8364;&#8221;are all a part of the strange and sometimes contradictory sum of me. I have sometimes gone almost too far in the opposite direction, sharing my opinions much too freely. I remember discussing movies with someone once, a person I didn&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t know that well, and getting a little bit too excited, and responding to one of their recommendations with, &#226;&#8364;&#339;No way&#226;&#8364;&#8221;that SUCKS,&#226;&#8364; and then having that person look at me very confused and insulted. I sometimes have to remind myself that not everyone communicates this way. But we all should! I&#226;&#8364;&#8482;d like to inspire everyone to express a controversial or embarrassing opinion about art today, and to not care what anyone else thinks about it.</div
></content
><author
><name
>Erin Wolverton</name
><email
>erin.wolverton@case.edu</email
><uri
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal</uri
></author
></entry
><entry
><title
>A Condensed History of Project Runway</title
><link href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/04/15/a_condensed_history_of_project_runway"
 /><id
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/04/15/a_condensed_history_of_project_runway</id
><published
>2010-04-15T13:00:00Z</published
><updated
>2010-10-03T23:50:20Z</updated
><category term="TV" label="TV"
 /><category term="art" label="art"
 /><category term="audrey hepburn" label="audrey hepburn"
 /><category term="chris march" label="chris march"
 /><category term="christian siriano" label="christian siriano"
 /><category term="clothes" label="clothes"
 /><category term="fashion" label="fashion"
 /><category term="heidi klum" label="heidi klum"
 /><category term="metropolitan museum of art" label="metropolitan museum of art"
 /><category term="michael kors" label="michael kors"
 /><category term="nina garcia" label="nina garcia"
 /><category term="pam grier" label="pam grier"
 /><category term="project runway" label="project runway"
 /><category term="project runway angela" label="project runway angela"
 /><category term="project runway chris" label="project runway chris"
 /><category term="project runway christian" label="project runway christian"
 /><category term="project runway daniel v." label="project runway daniel v."
 /><category term="project runway emilio" label="project runway emilio"
 /><category term="project runway epperson" label="project runway epperson"
 /><category term="project runway jay" label="project runway jay"
 /><category term="project runway jillian" label="project runway jillian"
 /><category term="project runway kara manx" label="project runway kara manx"
 /><category term="project runway kara saun" label="project runway kara saun"
 /><category term="project runway korto" label="project runway korto"
 /><category term="project runway laura" label="project runway laura"
 /><category term="project runway leanne" label="project runway leanne"
 /><category term="project runway michael" label="project runway michael"
 /><category term="project runway nicolas" label="project runway nicolas"
 /><category term="project runway ricky" label="project runway ricky"
 /><category term="project runway sweet p" label="project runway sweet p"
 /><category term="project runway victorya" label="project runway victorya"
 /><category term="roberto cavalli" label="roberto cavalli"
 /><category term="tim gunn" label="tim gunn"
 /><content type="xhtml"
><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
>In honor of the finale of the most recent season of 
<em>Project Runway</em>, the first half of which airs tonight, I am counting down some of my favorite challenge outfits of all time. Some of these outfits were wins, some got commendations from the judges but lost to an outfit I didn&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t prize as highly. The judges didn&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t, at least not that I remember, trash any of them (although one was made from trash, hee hee). I won&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t pretend that I haven&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t occasionally loved something to which Heidi or Michael or Nina was indifferent, however. 
<em>Note: I wrote this entry a few weeks ago, and waited to post it to coincide with the finale. I had chosen my top ten and I really didn&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t think that any amazing outfits were going to creep in there in the interim. I was wrong! So I am opening my top ten favorite</em> Project Runway 
<em>outfits with an honorable mention from last week.</em> 
<strong>11. (honorable mention) Emilio&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s circus dress</strong> Damn that Emilio! He has one of the biggest egos that has ever appeared on 
<em>Project Runway</em> and that is SAYING SOMETHING. He has been driving me crazy this entire season, becoming more and more inflated with self-importance with every one of his wins (and there&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s been many) and in last week&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s episode, he was grandstanding as much as ever. Sets my teeth on edge, that kind of behavior. But did you see the dress he made? Holy crap. 
<img alt="emilio circus dress.jpg" src="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/04/14/emilio%20circus%20dress.jpg" width="273" height="336" /> The challenge was to make a fashion-forward outfit that was &#226;&#8364;&#339;circus-inspired.&#226;&#8364; Two designers sent ridiculous costumes down the runway, and two of them kind of boring outfits in circus-y colors. Only Emilio did exactly what was requested (and won the challenge without any hesitation on the part of the judges): he made a dress that was beautiful on its own, but which also was reminiscent of the circus (the stripes, the polka dots, the trapeze-y poof of the skirt). &#226;&#8364;&#339;It looks like the circus! And it&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s BEAUTIFUL!&#226;&#8364; That&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s what designing is about, isn&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t it? (Now just quit giving Tim lip, Emilio! He&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s there to help!) Having dispatched of that, let&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s get to my preexisting top ten! 
<strong>10. Sweet P&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s denim dress</strong> This season four challenge was to create an outfit made entirely out of repurposed Levis. One of my favorite designers from that season, the strangely loveable biker chick Sweet P, started out envisioning a long, flowing denim wedding gown. But when Tim Gunn suggested it was too &#226;&#8364;&#339;hippie-dippie,&#226;&#8364; she chopped it off at the knee and made the most adorable Little Blue Dress you could imagine. Michael Kors said it had &#226;&#8364;&#339;voodoo&#226;&#8364; and Heidi chimed in, &#226;&#8364;&#339;Slimming voodoo!&#226;&#8364; She then said that any of them would be eager to wear it, though she couldn&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t speak for Michael. He replied, &#226;&#8364;&#339;Well, with the right shoe&#226;&#8364;&#166;&#226;&#8364; 
<img alt="sweet p denim dress.jpg" src="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/04/14/sweet%20p%20denim%20dress.jpg" width="176" height="332" /> Why it didn&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t win: Branding. The guest judge, a VP from Levi&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s, complained that it wasn&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t recognizable enough as Levi&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s. They instead gave the win 
<a href="http://www.denimblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/ricky-project-runway-dress.jpg">to crying Ricky</a>, who was gone the next week. Click ahead--unless you have dial-up, in which case don't bother, because there are pictures galore!</div
></content
><author
><name
>Erin Wolverton</name
><email
>erin.wolverton@case.edu</email
><uri
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal</uri
></author
></entry
><entry
><title
>Trouble brewing...</title
><link href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/04/14/trouble_brewing"
 /><id
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/04/14/trouble_brewing</id
><published
>2010-04-15T02:51:41Z</published
><updated
>2010-10-03T23:51:36Z</updated
><category term="TV" label="TV"
 /><category term="breaking bad" label="breaking bad"
 /><category term="david duchovny" label="david duchovny"
 /><category term="gillian anderson" label="gillian anderson"
 /><category term="jack black" label="jack black"
 /><category term="lucy liu" label="lucy liu"
 /><category term="netflix" label="netflix"
 /><category term="ryan reynolds" label="ryan reynolds"
 /><category term="sci fi" label="sci fi"
 /><category term="the x-files" label="the x-files"
 /><content type="xhtml"
><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
>
<img alt="x files pic.jpg" src="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/04/14/x%20files%20pic.jpg" width="320" height="240" /> I have two papers to write in the next five days, and I just discovered that the entire run of 
<em>The X-Files</em> is on Netflix Instant View! In this moment, I am desperate for some supernatural investigation and mid-nineties style. (Oh, Scully. The poofy hair. The big burly business suits. She was only 25 in the first season of that show, but she looked 40. Of course, Gillian Anderson looks awesome now, and Duchovny is crawling with sleaze.) 
<img alt="x files pair pic.jpg" src="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/04/14/x%20files%20pair%20pic.jpg" width="269" height="400" /> I occasionally catch 
<em>The X-Files</em> playing at 2am on 
<a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/SHOWBIZ/TV/07/06/scifi.syfy.change/index.html">the no-longer Sci-Fi channel, what is it again?</a> but that's not exactly a prime time to catch up on my high school viewing pleasures. When these papers are written, I am hitting Season One SO HARD! 
<a href="http://www.tv.com/the-x-files/squeeze/episode/493/recap.html?tag=episode_header;recap">"Tooms"!</a> 
<a href="http://www.tv.com/the-x-files/beyond-the-sea/episode/503/recap.html?tag=episode_header;recap">"Beyond the Sea"!</a> 
<a href="http://www.tv.com/the-x-files/e.b.e./episode/507/recap.html?tag=episode_header;recap">"E.B.E."</a> and the introduction of the Lone Gunmen! Not to mention the awesomeness of playing Spot the Now-Famous Bit Player! (Oh, right, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0751095/">Jack Black was in this episode</a>! 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0751133/">Hey, is that Lucy Liu</a>? I think 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0751212/">that high school boy is Ryan Reynolds</a> never mind he's already dead!) P.S. One of my favorite current shows, 
<em>Breaking Bad</em> (in its third season on AMC right now! how about some money, AMC?) is heavily populated with 
<em>X-Files</em> alumni behind the scenes. Both shows are thus similar stylistically even if their content is pretty different. Just a word to those who might not have known of the connection. P.P.S. And now back to, you know, the work.</div
></content
><author
><name
>Erin Wolverton</name
><email
>erin.wolverton@case.edu</email
><uri
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal</uri
></author
></entry
><entry
><title
>Received in the mail today...</title
><link href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/04/05/received_in_the_mail_today"
 /><id
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/04/05/received_in_the_mail_today</id
><published
>2010-04-05T16:53:19Z</published
><updated
>2010-10-04T00:20:42Z</updated
><category term="TV" label="TV"
 /><category term="bed bath and beyond" label="bed bath and beyond"
 /><category term="it's always sunny in philadelphia" label="it's always sunny in philadelphia"
 /><category term="kill bill vol. 1" label="kill bill vol. 1"
 /><category term="kill bill vol. 2" label="kill bill vol. 2"
 /><category term="ma exam" label="ma exam"
 /><category term="movies" label="movies"
 /><category term="rewards" label="rewards"
 /><category term="scarface (1932)" label="scarface (1932)"
 /><category term="site stuff" label="site stuff"
 /><content type="xhtml"
><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
>
<ul>
<li>From Netflix: 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0023427/">
<em>Scarface, the Shame of the Nation</em> (1932)</a></li>
<li style="list-style: none">
<br />
</li>
<li>An ad for a local Jewish community center gym.</li>
<li style="list-style: none">
<br />
</li>
<li>Two coupons for Bed Bath and Beyond to throw on my preexisting pile of Bed Bath and Beyond coupons.</li>
<li style="list-style: none">
<br />
</li>
<li>Two boxes from Amazon! My "I passed my MA exam" celebration care package which I ordered for myself!
<ul>
<li>
<a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=qkwsrZl0jYQC&amp;printsec=frontcover&amp;dq=one+world+a+global+anthology+of+short+stories&amp;source=bl&amp;ots=aLEBRrEVaq&amp;sig=fhz3N3mTubdk71imtnu6EFpAkow&amp;hl=en&amp;ei=KAq6S-mEMYKBlAfA4eGVCg&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=book_result&amp;ct=result&amp;resnum=7&amp;ved=0CCkQ6AEwBg#v=onepage&amp;q=&amp;f=false">One book of short stories</a>
</li>
<li style="list-style: none">
<br />
</li>
<li>
<em>Kill Bill</em> vols. 1 and 2 on DVD (because, though I prefer vol. 2, to have only vol. 2 on DVD seemed incomplete)</li>
<li style="list-style: none">
<br />
</li>
<li>the third season of 
<em>It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia</em></li>
</ul>
<img alt="sunny-3.jpg" src="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/04/05/sunny-3.jpg" width="328" height="218" /></li>
</ul>I am really trying not to indulge in any of these care package entertainments right now. I should be working! Instead I am...wasting half the morning figuring out what code to use to nest a list inside a list. (Neat, hey?)</div
></content
><author
><name
>Erin Wolverton</name
><email
>erin.wolverton@case.edu</email
><uri
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal</uri
></author
></entry
><entry
><title
>Last night's Amazing Race</title
><link href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/03/29/last_nights_amazing_race"
 /><id
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/03/29/last_nights_amazing_race</id
><published
>2010-03-30T04:16:45Z</published
><updated
>2010-10-04T00:23:30Z</updated
><category term="TV" label="TV"
 /><category term="seychelles" label="seychelles"
 /><category term="the amazing race" label="the amazing race"
 /><content type="xhtml"
><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
>
<img alt="20100329-tartortoise.jpg" src="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/03/29/20100329-tartortoise.jpg" width="435" height="290" /> 
<em>above: a Seychellesian tortoise enjoys his 15 minutes of fame</em> Things you only hear on 
<em>The Amazing Race</em> (tonight courtesy of Brent): "The cowboys and the lesbians are back at the place. We had to go get our coconut." (Does anybody else really want to visit 
<a href="http://www.seychelles.travel/en/about_seychelles/island.php?rc=1&amp;aid=16">the Seychelles</a> now?)</div
></content
><author
><name
>Erin Wolverton</name
><email
>erin.wolverton@case.edu</email
><uri
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal</uri
></author
></entry
><entry
><title
>No Use Lying in the Electronic Age</title
><link href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/03/27/no_use_lying_in_the_electronic_age"
 /><id
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/03/27/no_use_lying_in_the_electronic_age</id
><published
>2010-03-27T14:16:41Z</published
><updated
>2010-10-04T00:24:21Z</updated
><category term="TV" label="TV"
 /><category term="chloe sevigny" label="chloe sevigny"
 /><category term="daniel fienberg" label="daniel fienberg"
 /><category term="movies" label="movies"
 /><category term="sean o'neal" label="sean o'neal"
 /><category term="the av club" label="the av club"
 /><category term="the fien print" label="the fien print"
 /><content type="xhtml"
><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
>Oh, Chloe Sevigny! Caught red-handed! 
<img alt="chloe sevigny.jpg" src="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/03/27/chloe%20sevigny.jpg" width="214" height="326" /> Just a few days ago, the oddly fashionable actress 
<a href="http://www.avclub.com/articles/chloe-sevigny,39476/">did an interview</a> with Sean O'Neal of the AV Club, where she made some dismissive comments about the TV show 
<em>Big Love</em>. That's the show she's 
<em>on</em>, incidentally, the show for which 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001721/awards">she won a Golden Globe</a> this year. Well, O'Neal commented about the show being "over the top" in its most recent season, and she agreed with it, but more than that--she ran with it. She riffed on the question, talking about how "awful" it was, comparing it to a telenovela, ultimately finishing on this statement:
<blockquote>Oh God, I know. Oh, God. It&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s too much. It&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s too much. But I hope the fans will stick with us and tune in next year. There&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s a lot of people who really love this season, surprisingly. God, I&#226;&#8364;&#8482;m going to get in so much trouble. [Laughs.]</blockquote>Hey, she was right! She did get in trouble, and 
<a href="http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/2010/03/26/big-love-chloe-sevigny-apology-awful/">immediately announced</a> that she had been quoted out of context, that she was exhausted, that she didn't know what she was saying, and (this is my favorite) that she hadn't even 
<em>seen</em> the whole season yet because she doesn't have a TV. Well, that made everything all kittens and roses again--excepting for Sean O'Neal, who recorded the interview and 
<a href="http://www.avclub.com/articles/chloe-sevigny-apologizes-for-av-club-interview,39609/">posted a clip of it</a> on the AV Club site. Was Sevigny exhausted? Well, maybe. She kind of always sounds exhausted. 
<em>That's how she sounds</em>. Was she confused about the question? No, she and O'Neal bantered about it, there was back-and-forth. Did he "provoke" her into saying it? He did deride the show first. But she hasn't confessed to being under some magic spell which makes it impossible for her to disagree with things. Did she cross some professional boundary by making the comments? Well, that's less cut-and-dried. Don't bite the hand that feeds you and all that. There's a great 
<a href="http://www.hitfix.com/blogs/2008-12-6-the-fien-print/posts/celebrities-shouldn-t-need-to-apologize-for-having-opinions">rundown of the whole thing</a> at The Fien Print. Fienberg asks,
<blockquote>why is it acceptable for an actress to throw a professional journalist under the bus (pretty clearly without cause), but it's unacceptable for an actress to have a clearly articulated and intelligent point of view? Why can't Sevigny just be proud to be smart and opinionated?</blockquote>Good question. I agree that if an actress doesn't personally love and adore the show she happens to be on, it doesn't have to be a PR crisis. Do you think there's an actor anywhere who would declare, "I am in love with every project I ever took part in! Every movie I made is my 
<em>favorite</em> movie." Personal taste is variable. What does she really owe her show-runners other than turning in the best performance she can every week? She has to be the show's Number One Fan also? In my opinion, the most insulting thing she said was actually this line: "There&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s a lot of people who really love this season, surprisingly." That takes it out of the realm of "Chloe didn't like it," to "if you liked it you're stupid." But she hasn't apologized for that line. Interesting.</div
></content
><author
><name
>Erin Wolverton</name
><email
>erin.wolverton@case.edu</email
><uri
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal</uri
></author
></entry
><entry
><title
>Community Does Mad Men!</title
><link href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/03/05/community_does_mad_men"
 /><id
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/03/05/community_does_mad_men</id
><published
>2010-03-05T15:37:50Z</published
><updated
>2010-10-04T00:34:45Z</updated
><category term="30 rock" label="30 rock"
 /><category term="TV" label="TV"
 /><category term="community" label="community"
 /><category term="mad men" label="mad men"
 /><category term="parks and recreation" label="parks and recreation"
 /><category term="the office" label="the office"
 /><content type="xhtml"
><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
>
<em>Community</em> is getting awesomer and awesomer every week. I can understand why you might not like it--it really doesn't have a ton in common with its more understated Thursday night neighbors 
<em>The Office</em> and 
<em>Parks and Recreation</em>--it's more of a whip-fast smart-silly like 
<em>30 Rock</em>. I'm a Renaissance woman so I enjoy both of those types of shows. But of the three of them that aired last night (
<em>30 Rock</em> was shuffled off so Jim and Pam could have a full hour to birth their baby) 
<em>Community</em> was easily the funniest. There was a good plotline about Jeff taking pool for his phys ed credit and objecting to required uniform of 80s-style short-shorts (I won't go into how that story wraps up because you've got to see it to believe it). But the best moment was courtesy of oddball Abed. See, the gang thought that a pretty girl from Spanish class liked him and they were encouraging him to go talk to her. He didn't think he could as himself, so he tried out a variety of characters who might feel more comfortable hitting on her ("I think that one was a vampire") until he settled on the right one. This wasn't it, but it was my favorite. 
<object width="512" height="296">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.hulu.com/embed/9TuCf2m45LQU3ok2Phyy7w/582/638/i365" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed src="http://www.hulu.com/embed/9TuCf2m45LQU3ok2Phyy7w/582/638/i365" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="512" height="296" />
</object> The impersonation was SO GOOD that I knew who he was doing before he said so. Right around, "Then you picked the wrong outfit." The inside joke: Annie, played by Alison Brie, plays a secondary character (she's Mrs. Pete Campbell!) on 
<em>Mad Men</em>.</div
></content
><author
><name
>Erin Wolverton</name
><email
>erin.wolverton@case.edu</email
><uri
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal</uri
></author
></entry
><entry
><title
>Two Bittersweet Stories About Roger Ebert</title
><link href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/03/02/two_bittersweet_stories_about_roger_ebert"
 /><id
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/03/02/two_bittersweet_stories_about_roger_ebert</id
><published
>2010-03-03T02:37:18Z</published
><updated
>2010-10-04T00:36:46Z</updated
><category term="TV" label="TV"
 /><category term="chaz ebert" label="chaz ebert"
 /><category term="chris jones" label="chris jones"
 /><category term="deadspin" label="deadspin"
 /><category term="esquire" label="esquire"
 /><category term="movies" label="movies"
 /><category term="roger ebert" label="roger ebert"
 /><category term="the office" label="the office"
 /><category term="twitter accounts of famous people" label="twitter accounts of famous people"
 /><category term="will leitch" label="will leitch"
 /><content type="xhtml"
><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
>
<img alt="Ebert.jpg" src="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/03/02/Ebert.jpg" width="152" height="232" /> Certainly my favorite film critic writing right now is Roger Ebert, who in less than 1000 words can cut a bad movie down to size, or build a pedestal on which a great movie will sit. His health problems of the last few years have had severe effects on his body (robbing him of his voice, notably), but that has only caused him to multiply his writing output. In addition to his reviews, he's 
<a href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/">blogging</a> and philosophizing and 
<a href="http://twitter.com/ebertchicago">even tweeting</a> continually. A few weeks ago, he authorized a cover story to be written about him for 
<em>Esquire</em> magazine, revealing very intimate details of his life as a partial invalid. It's a sad and lovely article, making you feel like you're hanging around in the viewing room with Ebert and his kickass wife, Chaz. 
<a href="http://www.esquire.com/features/roger-ebert-0310">Roger Ebert: The Essential Man</a> (Chris Jones, from 
<em>Esquire</em>) Today, I read another tribute to Ebert, this one of a very different kind. A writer called Will Leitch describes how he idolized Ebert, hugely insulted him in print, and grew to regret it. It's a really compelling tale, with Leitch in full apology mode. Remember that time Ryan on 
<em>The Office</em> excused his past behavior by saying: "I was in my mid-twenties"? That basically sums up Leitch's explanation of his behavior, but he is wise enough as a writer now that the story he wrote here is really about what an unmissable writer Ebert has continued to be despite his ordeals. 
<a href="http://deadspin.com/5482198/my-roger-ebert-story">My Roger Ebert Story</a> (Will Leitch, from 
<em>Deadspin</em>)</div
></content
><author
><name
>Erin Wolverton</name
><email
>erin.wolverton@case.edu</email
><uri
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal</uri
></author
></entry
><entry
><title
>Extras is extra funny</title
><link href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/02/27/extras_is_extra_funny"
 /><id
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/02/27/extras_is_extra_funny</id
><published
>2010-02-28T03:16:45Z</published
><updated
>2010-10-04T00:38:27Z</updated
><category term="TV" label="TV"
 /><category term="extras" label="extras"
 /><category term="patrick stewart" label="patrick stewart"
 /><category term="procrastination" label="procrastination"
 /><category term="ricky gervais" label="ricky gervais"
 /><category term="star trek" label="star trek"
 /><category term="the office (uk)" label="the office (uk)"
 /><content type="xhtml"
><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
>Today, I braved the snow for five minutes to hit the library and pick up some books I had on hold. I wandered into the DVD section browsing for a TV show on DVD that I could use as background noise while I worked on my grading. In that sense, I failed. I picked up the first season of 
<em>Extras</em>, the show Ricky Gervais made after putting a conclusive point of punctuation on his original series, 
<em>The Office</em> (that's the UK edition, of course). Though the show was, in fact, hilarious, I lost four hours of my afternoon to it. Too much funny! Could not concentrate on anything else. But I can highly recommend the show! In fact, I will surely be hitting the library tomorrow to pick up season two. (What's awesome about Gervais' series is that they're never longer than six episodes. Even though I fritter away my time, it's not really a huge loss.) The premise is that Andy, a pale, paunchy dude who has crossed the threshold of middle age, thinks that he has what it takes to be an incredible actor. The only work he can get, however, is playing the guy in the background. So, he sucks up to the famous actors he meets in hopes that he will make connections. In this clip, Patrick Stewart of 
<em>Star Trek</em> fame regally outlines his script idea for the befuddled Andy. 
<object width="425" height="344">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Fg_cwI1Xj4M&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" />
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Fg_cwI1Xj4M&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344" />
</object></div
></content
><author
><name
>Erin Wolverton</name
><email
>erin.wolverton@case.edu</email
><uri
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal</uri
></author
></entry
><entry
><title
>Breaking my silence on the late night feud!</title
><link href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/02/23/breaking_my_silence_on_the_late_night_feud"
 /><id
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/02/23/breaking_my_silence_on_the_late_night_feud</id
><published
>2010-02-23T22:02:21Z</published
><updated
>2010-10-04T00:39:50Z</updated
><category term="TV" label="TV"
 /><category term="commercials" label="commercials"
 /><category term="conan o'brien" label="conan o'brien"
 /><category term="jay leno" label="jay leno"
 /><category term="radiohead" label="radiohead"
 /><category term="the av club" label="the av club"
 /><category term="washington post" label="washington post"
 /><content type="xhtml"
><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
>...I know, people were on pins and needles. I avoiding taking a position on the whole Conan O'Brien-Jay Leno feud, based solely on the fact that I didn't watch either show. In general, though, I find Leno smug and unfunny (and easily one of the worst interviewers on the talk show circuit right now). Thus, I have no problem showing some anti-Jay propaganda. This is a real promo for the return of Leno's show, with the original music replaced by a classic Radiohead tune. 
<a href="http://www.avclub.com/articles/great-job-internet-jay-leno-vs-radiohead,38475/">Tipped by the AV Club</a>. 
<object width="425" height="344">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/tJJ6o4eYynU&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en_US&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" />
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/tJJ6o4eYynU&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en_US&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="425" height="344" />
</object> Incidentally, even though Conan has collected his millions and walked into the proverbial sunset, the feud continues--now it's just a matter of rhetoric. Look at these two completely different takes on the guest lineup for Jay's first week. 
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/22/AR2010022204720.html">No Leno boycott as celebs line up to welcome Jay back</a> (from the 
<em>Washington Post</em>) 
<a href="http://www.avclub.com/articles/sucky-jay-leno-announces-sucky-guests-for-his-suck,38490/">Sucky Jay Leno announces sucky guests for his sucky return</a> (from the 
<em>AV Club</em>)</div
></content
><author
><name
>Erin Wolverton</name
><email
>erin.wolverton@case.edu</email
><uri
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal</uri
></author
></entry
><entry
><title
>Snow and Helplessness</title
><link href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/02/11/snow_and_helplessness"
 /><id
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/02/11/snow_and_helplessness</id
><published
>2010-02-11T16:49:14Z</published
><updated
>2010-10-04T00:42:17Z</updated
><category term="TV" label="TV"
 /><category term="bugs" label="bugs"
 /><category term="cleveland" label="cleveland"
 /><category term="edith hamilton" label="edith hamilton"
 /><category term="gross" label="gross"
 /><category term="lost" label="lost"
 /><category term="mythology" label="mythology"
 /><category term="snow" label="snow"
 /><category term="weather" label="weather"
 /><content type="xhtml"
><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
>
<img alt="large_snow_rant.jpg" src="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/02/11/large_snow_rant.jpg" width="367" height="242" /> Feeling a little out of control this week! Over the weekend one of my cupboards was infiltrated by grain beetles. (EEEEWWWWWWWWW.) We are buried under a mass of snow (and 
<a href="http://blog.cleveland.com/metro/2010/02/cleveland_named_worst_winter_c.html">recently named "worst snow city" in the country</a>! aces!) plus the weather has knocked out my cable and internet since Monday. Thus, this quotation that I read the other day feels particularly apt. "An absolutely certain way in those days to draw down on one a wretched fate was to claim superiority in anything over any deity; nevertheless, people were perpetually doing so." Edith Hamilton, 
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0446607258/ref=pd_lpo_k2_dp_sr_1?pf_rd_p=486539851&amp;pf_rd_s=lpo-top-stripe-1&amp;pf_rd_t=201&amp;pf_rd_i=0316341517&amp;pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&amp;pf_rd_r=06WJ1BJ2QHBHEAHZGZKV">
<em>Mythology</em>
</a> I get it, universe! Plagues, storms and deprivation have done their jobs. I AM YOUR PAWN. (Now can I have my cable and Internet back? I'm really wondering what happened on 
<em>Lost</em>.)</div
></content
><author
><name
>Erin Wolverton</name
><email
>erin.wolverton@case.edu</email
><uri
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal</uri
></author
></entry
><entry
><title
>Racing to "The Iraq" and Back</title
><link href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/02/05/racing_to_the_iraq_and_back"
 /><id
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/02/05/racing_to_the_iraq_and_back</id
><published
>2010-02-06T04:11:12Z</published
><updated
>2010-10-04T00:44:50Z</updated
><category term="TV" label="TV"
 /><category term="mike and mel white" label="mike and mel white"
 /><category term="miss teen usa" label="miss teen usa"
 /><category term="the amazing race" label="the amazing race"
 /><content type="xhtml"
><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
>The newest season of 
<em>The Amazing Race</em> begins a week from Sunday. I happened to check out 
<a href="http://www.cbs.com/primetime/amazing_race/">the show's website</a> and discovered that one of the teams is a pair of dating models. Oh, boring, right? Every season has at least one pair of dating models. What makes this pair so special? Well, one of them is this person: 
<object width="425" height="344">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/WALIARHHLII&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" />
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/WALIARHHLII&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344" />
</object> Upon reading this news, my emotions are mixed. Firstly, people who are dumb make me sad. That people who are dumb can find fame and success if they are also beautiful women makes me angry. That this woman became a national joke makes me...a bit amused, truth be told. That she has finagled her way onto one of my favorite shows ever makes me suspicious. I guess everybody deserves a chance to redeem themselves. However, I'll say this: you better not be in this to extend your 15 minutes, Vanna! 
<em>The Amazing Race</em> is hard, man, and people who go on the show just to publicize their careers do not tend to acquit themselves that well. Case in point: 
<a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/showtracker/2009/10/the-amazing-race-slip-and-slide.html">that girl who was an aspiring country singer</a>. She did not come out of that thing looking too good. And neither did her boyfriend. How much do I miss 
<a href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2009/03/31/the_amazing_race_strategy_luck_and_the_inevitable_elimination_of_the_teams_i_like">the Whites</a> right now?</div
></content
><author
><name
>Erin Wolverton</name
><email
>erin.wolverton@case.edu</email
><uri
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal</uri
></author
></entry
><entry
><title
>LOST! TONIGHT!</title
><link href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/02/02/lost_tonight"
 /><id
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/02/02/lost_tonight</id
><published
>2010-02-02T21:21:08Z</published
><updated
>2010-10-04T00:48:39Z</updated
><category term="TV" label="TV"
 /><category term="carlton cuse" label="carlton cuse"
 /><category term="chicago tribune" label="chicago tribune"
 /><category term="damon lindelof" label="damon lindelof"
 /><category term="drinking games" label="drinking games"
 /><category term="floating around the 'net" label="floating around the 'net"
 /><category term="lost" label="lost"
 /><category term="maureen ryan" label="maureen ryan"
 /><category term="nash bridges" label="nash bridges"
 /><category term="the onion" label="the onion"
 /><category term="the sopranos" label="the sopranos"
 /><content type="xhtml"
><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
>
<img alt="lost season 6.jpg" src="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/02/02/lost%20season%206.jpg" width="450" height="300" /> I had a busy, busy day, but it was all worth it because now it's mid-afternoon and I basically have no responsibilities to the world at large until tomorrow. Turned in a paper this morning, my lesson plans for the week are set. That all means that I can--and WILL--spend the next four hours watching 
<em>Lost</em>! The last few episodes of the fifth season (that's where they left off last spring) and then at nine o'clock (eight central!) the first episode of the final season begins! Yeah, I'm excited. Here's the schedule again: 
<strong>8pm-9pm</strong>: They're doing one of their classic catch-up hours (for the casual 
<em>Lost</em>ie). 
<strong>9pm-11pm</strong>: 2-part season opener! 
<a href="http://featuresblogs.chicagotribune.com/entertainment_tv/2010/01/lost-carlton-cuse-damon-lindelof-season-6-abc.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+chicagotribune%2Fthewatcher+%28chicagotribune.com+-+The+Watcher+television+blog%29">Here's the first part of</a> an awesome 3-part interview with (
<em>Lost</em> creators) Carlton Cuse and Damon Lindelof by Maureen Ryan at the 
<em>Chicago Tribune</em>. Lots of interesting discussion about satisfying television finales (they really liked how 
<em>The Sopranos</em> ended, if that tells you anything) and how there would be no 
<em>Lost</em> if not for 
<a href="http://www.tv.com/nash-bridges/show/114/summary.html?q=nash%20bridges&amp;tag=search_results;title;1">
<em>Nash Bridges</em>
</a>. Also, 
<a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-18971-LOST-Examiner~y2009m12d31-LOST-characters-explain-how-to-make-a-sandwich">
<em>Lost</em> characters explain how to make a sandwich.</a> More 
<em>Lost</em> madness after the jump!</div
></content
><author
><name
>Erin Wolverton</name
><email
>erin.wolverton@case.edu</email
><uri
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal</uri
></author
></entry
><entry
><title
>Narrating My Procrastination (in the Manner of Hoarders)</title
><link href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/01/31/narrating_my_procrastination_in_the_manner_of_hoarders"
 /><id
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/01/31/narrating_my_procrastination_in_the_manner_of_hoarders</id
><published
>2010-01-31T16:16:56Z</published
><updated
>2010-10-04T00:50:47Z</updated
><category term="TV" label="TV"
 /><category term="hoarders" label="hoarders"
 /><category term="procrastination" label="procrastination"
 /><content type="xhtml"
><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
>So I love this show 
<a href="http://www.aetv.com/hoarders/">
<em>Hoarders</em>
</a>, in which professional organizers, psychologists, and cameras all descend upon a home that the resident has compulsively filled with junk. 
<img alt="hoarders.jpg" src="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/01/31/hoarders.jpg" width="362" height="202" /> This morning I was procrastinating on writing a paper, and reading some internet forums re: 
<em>Hoarders</em>. Like most viewers of the show, I take pleasure in the fact that, because I can see my own floor, I am not a hoarder myself. But then, I realized that my own compulsive avoidance is comparable to that of the people on 
<em>Hoarders</em>. I started to fantasize (because it's so much a better use of my time) that the show was instead called 
<em>Procrastinators</em> and that I was on it. Images of me Not Working will be intercut with ominous statements communicating how out of control I am. (On the 
<em>Hoarders</em> forums they call it the "black screen of judgment.") It would look like this:
<blockquote>
<strong>Black Screen of Judgment</strong>: 
<em>Erin has a paper due on Tuesday, which she has barely started.</em>
<br />
<br />
<strong>Cut to</strong>: Erin, curled up in down comforter, screwing around on the web. The picture of laziness.
<br />
<br />
<strong>Black Screen of Judgment</strong>: 
<em>Though she has vowed that today will be &#226;&#8364;&#339;all about the paper,&#226;&#8364; she has been surfing the forums at 
<a href="http://forums.televisionwithoutpity.com/">Television Without Pity</a> for the past 40 minutes.</em>
<br />
<br />
<strong>Cut to</strong>: Piles of books on Erin's desk and bookshelves. Many have bookmarks in them, 1/3 to 1/2 of the way through.
<br />
<br />
<strong>Black Screen of Judgment</strong>: 
<em>Erin&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s schedule was completely open yesterday. She was awake for approximately 16 hours, but did not do as much of a minute of work on her paper. Asked whether she accomplished anything she intended to do that day, she replied that she had done &#226;&#8364;&#339;some reading,&#226;&#8364; but would not specify.</em>
<br />
<br />
<strong>Cut to, Erin, testimonial</strong>: I also loaded the dishwasher. And did one load of laundry. That I haven't put away yet. But I don't have a problem.
<br />
<br />
<strong>Black Screen of Judgment</strong>: 
<em>The paper Erin is having so much trouble writing needs to be just five pages long.</em></blockquote>You know, this exercise was very helpful. I think I will always imagine my problems this way.</div
></content
><author
><name
>Erin Wolverton</name
><email
>erin.wolverton@case.edu</email
><uri
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal</uri
></author
></entry
><entry
><title
>The Era of the Clip Show is Over (and The Office Didn't Get the Memo)</title
><link href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/01/21/the_era_of_the_clip_show_is_over_and_the_office_didnt_get_the_memo"
 /><id
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/01/21/the_era_of_the_clip_show_is_over_and_the_office_didnt_get_the_memo</id
><published
>2010-01-22T02:27:20Z</published
><updated
>2010-10-04T01:04:44Z</updated
><category term="TV" label="TV"
 /><category term="clip shows" label="clip shows"
 /><category term="friends (tv)" label="friends (tv)"
 /><category term="parodies" label="parodies"
 /><category term="the office" label="the office"
 /><category term="the simpsons" label="the simpsons"
 /><content type="xhtml"
><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
>
<img alt="schrute.jpg" src="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/01/21/schrute.jpg" width="223" height="307" /> I was about five minutes into tonight's episode of 
<em>The Office</em> when I said to myself, "...Are they doing a 
<em>clip show</em>?" I hadn't seen one of those in so long it took me utterly by surprise. Remember when clip shows were on all the time? 
<em>Friends</em> used to air one every season. I think the first one was the episode where Ross wavered on whether to send Rachel an invitation to his wedding, and, once he did, she wavered on whether or not to go. That flimsy 'plot' was interspersed with flashback clips of Ross and Rachel's relationship. (P.S. To all Martians or Amish people or people raised by wolves who haven't seen 
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Friends-Complete-Fourth-Jennifer-Aniston/dp/B0000996IS/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=dvd&amp;qid=1264129469&amp;sr=8-1">that season of 
<em>Friends</em></a>, DO IT! You won't believe how that whole wedding thing goes.) 
<em>The Office</em> did much the same thing; there was some weak premise about some guy from corporate who had to do something or other and just asked questions meant to lead up to clip montages: "Have there been incidences of sexual harassment in the workplace?" Oh my gosh, there have! I won't even talk about the cheesetastic Jim-Pam montage. Although I never pass up the opportunity to watch the Jim-masquerades-as-Dwight moment again ("Bears. Beets. 
<em>Battlestar Galactica</em>.") the other 29 minutes of the episode seemed pointless. Thinking back on that episode of 
<em>Friends</em> (
<a href="http://www.friends-tv.org/zz421.html">"The One With All the Invitations"</a>), clip shows actually had a function then. 
<em>Friends</em> wasn't in syndication yet, and no shows were on DVD. If you wanted to see that moment from 
<a href="http://www.friends-tv.org/zz214.html">the prom video episode</a> or whatever, that was kind of your only opportunity. That episode might have felt a little cheaty at the time, but what it did do was remind viewers of all of Ross and Rachel's greatest hits and set them up for the big season-ending wedding extravaganza. But 
<em>The Office</em>? Do you know how many times I've watched that show on DVD? Do you know how many Tuesday nights I've spent parked in front of TBS watching their weekly marathon? Let's just call it 
<em>most Tuesdays</em>. I'm just so used to that show being above average, and not falling back on hacky sitcom tricks. I might be a bit disillusioned now. Best clip show ever? How about 
<a href="http://www.snpp.com/episodes/3F31.html">"
<em>The Simpsons</em> 138th Episode Spectacular"</a>? That was a parody of the clip show, and according to that link, it aired in 1995. Let that tell you something, producers of 
<em>The Office</em>.</div
></content
><author
><name
>Erin Wolverton</name
><email
>erin.wolverton@case.edu</email
><uri
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal</uri
></author
></entry
></feed
>
