<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/topics-files/atom2xhtml.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<!-- This is a 512 byte XML comment that one must put into XML Atom feeds
such that browsers like Firefox 2.0 and IE7 will obey the XSL stylesheet.
Everybody hates overbearing browsers.
This is a 512 byte XML comment that one must put into XML Atom feeds
such that browsers like Firefox 2.0 and IE7 will obey the XSL stylesheet.
Everybody hates overbearing browsers.
This is a 512 byte XML comment that one must put into XML Atom feeds
such that browsers like Firefox 2.0 and IE7 will obey the XSL stylesheet.
Everybody hates overbearing browsers.
This is a 512 byte XML comment that one must put into XML Atom feeds
such that browsers like Firefox 2.0 and IE7 will obey the XSL stylesheet.
Everybody hates overbearing browsers.
This is a 512 byte XML comment that one must put into XML Atom feeds
such that browsers like Firefox 2.0 and IE7 will obey the XSL stylesheet.
Everybody hates overbearing browsers.
This is a 512 byte XML comment that one must put into XML Atom feeds
such that browsers like Firefox 2.0 and IE7 will obey the XSL stylesheet.
Everybody hates overbearing browsers. -->
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
><title
>Blog@Case Topics: entertainment weekly</title
><link rel="self" href="http://blog.case.edu/topics/entertainment%20weekly"
 /><id
>http://blog.case.edu/topics/entertainment%20weekly</id
><category term="entertainment weekly" label="entertainment weekly"
 /><link rel="related" href="http://blog.case.edu/topics/movies" title="movies"
 /><link rel="related" href="http://blog.case.edu/topics/summer%20movie%20watch" title="summer movie watch"
 /><link rel="related" href="http://blog.case.edu/topics/it's%20a%20wonderful%20life" title="it's a wonderful life"
 /><link rel="related" href="http://blog.case.edu/topics/schindler's%20list" title="schindler's list"
 /><link rel="related" href="http://blog.case.edu/topics/sam%20raimi" title="sam raimi"
 /><link rel="related" href="http://blog.case.edu/topics/steven%20spielberg" title="steven spielberg"
 /><link rel="related" href="http://blog.case.edu/topics/fargo" title="fargo"
 /><link rel="related" href="http://blog.case.edu/topics/back%20to%20the%20future" title="back to the future"
 /><link rel="related" href="http://blog.case.edu/topics/saving%20private%20ryan" title="saving private ryan"
 /><link rel="related" href="http://blog.case.edu/topics/fatal%20attraction" title="fatal attraction"
 /><link rel="related" href="http://blog.case.edu/topics/james%20cameron" title="james cameron"
 /><contributor
><name
>Erin Wolverton</name
><email
>erin.wolverton@case.edu</email
><uri
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal</uri
></contributor
><updated
>2010-10-04T01:13:44Z</updated
><entry
><title
>How Signs is Both Awesome and Misunderstood</title
><link href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/01/04/how_signs_is_both_awesome_and_misunderstood"
 /><id
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/01/04/how_signs_is_both_awesome_and_misunderstood</id
><published
>2010-01-04T05:33:01Z</published
><updated
>2010-10-04T01:13:44Z</updated
><category term="bruce almighty" label="bruce almighty"
 /><category term="dogma" label="dogma"
 /><category term="entertainment weekly" label="entertainment weekly"
 /><category term="evan almighty" label="evan almighty"
 /><category term="it's a wonderful life" label="it's a wonderful life"
 /><category term="lord of the rings" label="lord of the rings"
 /><category term="m. night shyamalan" label="m. night shyamalan"
 /><category term="mel gibson" label="mel gibson"
 /><category term="movies" label="movies"
 /><category term="religion" label="religion"
 /><category term="signs" label="signs"
 /><category term="splash" label="splash"
 /><category term="the sixth sense" label="the sixth sense"
 /><content type="xhtml"
><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
>
<img alt="signs.jpg" src="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/01/05/signs.jpg" width="309" height="246" /> I turned on the TV on Saturday night to see that 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0286106/">
<em>Signs</em>
</a> was about ten minutes from being over on TNT. I was so disappointed at having missed the thing that I threw the DVD on, utterly spur-of-the-moment. I LOVE 
<em>Signs</em>. And yet, many people are frustrated with or critical of this movie. I remember when it came out, people in my college dorms were complaining about it and people in the breakroom at the department store where I worked were complaining about it. It suffered from comparisons to 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0167404/">
<em>The Sixth Sense</em>
</a>, the movie its writer/director, M. Night Shyamalan, made first, although I think it&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s at least as accomplished as that one. Here, then, is my answer to the common criticisms of 
<em>Signs</em>.</div
></content
><author
><name
>Erin Wolverton</name
><email
>erin.wolverton@case.edu</email
><uri
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal</uri
></author
></entry
><entry
><title
>My God, Did You See That?</title
><link href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2009/11/22/my_god_did_you_see_that"
 /><id
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2009/11/22/my_god_did_you_see_that</id
><published
>2009-11-22T15:19:53Z</published
><updated
>2010-10-04T01:43:11Z</updated
><category term="3rd rock from the sun" label="3rd rock from the sun"
 /><category term="TV" label="TV"
 /><category term="brick" label="brick"
 /><category term="donald o'connor" label="donald o'connor"
 /><category term="entertainment weekly" label="entertainment weekly"
 /><category term="jason sudeikis" label="jason sudeikis"
 /><category term="joseph gordon-levitt" label="joseph gordon-levitt"
 /><category term="ken tucker" label="ken tucker"
 /><category term="lloyd dobler" label="lloyd dobler"
 /><category term="make 'em laugh" label="make 'em laugh"
 /><category term="saturday night live" label="saturday night live"
 /><category term="say anything" label="say anything"
 /><category term="singin' in the rain" label="singin' in the rain"
 /><category term="the lookout" label="the lookout"
 /><content type="xhtml"
><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
>
<img alt="Untitled.jpg" src="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2009/11/22/Untitled.jpg" width="322" height="214" /> I've missed the last few weeks of 
<em>Saturday Night Live</em>, but I tuned in last night simply because I happened to finish a book right around 11:30. I'm glad I saw this episode because host Joseph Gordon-Levitt kinda brought the house down. (In case the name's not familiar, or that picture's too small, he was 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0330687/">the kid on 
<em>3rd Rock from the Sun</em></a>; now he's 28 and making indie films. 
<em>The Lookout</em> was good; I hear 
<em>Brick</em> is great but it's been in my queue for about three years.) It's a pretty regular occurrence for hosts to sing and dance in their monologue; Gordon-Levitt chose to emulate the "Make 'Em Laugh" number from 
<em>Singin' in the Rain</em>. If you have seen that movie, you know the insane physicality involved. If you watched the show, you know that he 95% pulled it off, and that's an incredible achievement. 
<a href="http://watching-tv.ew.com/2009/11/22/saturday-night-live-joseph-gordon-levitt/">This link to an 
<em>Entertainment Weekly</em> recap</a> helpfully provides clips of both Gordon-Levitt's number as well as the original from 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0640307/">Donald O'Connor</a>. The writer of the recap, Ken Tucker, is very crotchety about the whole thing, huffing that he was not impressed because Gordon-Levitt didn't make it look as "effortless" as O'Connor did. Not to deride what O'Connor did back in 1952, but he had a cushion that Gordon-Levitt did not have: edits. Gordon-Levitt did the whole damn thing live! He landed BOTH runs up the wall! So he was huffing and puffing a little by the end. Tucker complains that the thing "wasn't funny," but I think he's missing the point. It wasn't meant to be funny, and it wasn't meant to be better than the original; it was meant to be an incredibly bold gesture by a guy who's just been hovering on the edge of superstardom for the past fifteen or so years, and who I expect will be much-talked about for the rest of the week. It was a calculated move saying, "hey, don't underestimate me," and my prediction is that it will work. (If you want funny, see the last skit of the night, also playable on the 
<em>EW</em> page. Gordon-Levitt played 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0098258/">Lloyd Dobler</a> doing the boombox serenade and Jason Sudeikis played the neighbor who just couldn't stop ruining it with questions. "Hey, whatcha doing? Is that Peter Gabriel?") Anyway, it impressed me. Watch those clips--O'Connor's first, so you know what the standard was, and then Gordon-Levitt's--and tell me you didn't have at least a little bit of admiration for the kid. (Who is, incidentally, exactly my age but still seems like he's twenty, only because he's been on TV since he was like four.)</div
></content
><author
><name
>Erin Wolverton</name
><email
>erin.wolverton@case.edu</email
><uri
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal</uri
></author
></entry
><entry
><title
>The AFI's 100 Greatest Movies (Pts. 1 and 2) Summed Up</title
><link href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2009/08/22/the_afis_100_greatest_movies_pts_1_and_2_summed_up"
 /><id
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2009/08/22/the_afis_100_greatest_movies_pts_1_and_2_summed_up</id
><published
>2009-08-23T01:16:43Z</published
><updated
>2010-10-04T02:36:35Z</updated
><category term="12 angry men" label="12 angry men"
 /><category term="a night at the opera" label="a night at the opera"
 /><category term="advise and consent" label="advise and consent"
 /><category term="alfred hitchcock" label="alfred hitchcock"
 /><category term="all about eve" label="all about eve"
 /><category term="american film institute" label="american film institute"
 /><category term="american graffiti" label="american graffiti"
 /><category term="ben-hur" label="ben-hur"
 /><category term="billy wilder" label="billy wilder"
 /><category term="born yesterday" label="born yesterday"
 /><category term="brief encounter" label="brief encounter"
 /><category term="casablanca" label="casablanca"
 /><category term="charade" label="charade"
 /><category term="citizen kane" label="citizen kane"
 /><category term="city lights" label="city lights"
 /><category term="close encounters of the third kind" label="close encounters of the third kind"
 /><category term="d.w. griffith" label="d.w. griffith"
 /><category term="david lean" label="david lean"
 /><category term="david lynch" label="david lynch"
 /><category term="doctor zhivago" label="doctor zhivago"
 /><category term="dr. strangelove" label="dr. strangelove"
 /><category term="duck soup" label="duck soup"
 /><category term="entertainment weekly" label="entertainment weekly"
 /><category term="fargo" label="fargo"
 /><category term="fay wray" label="fay wray"
 /><category term="frank capra" label="frank capra"
 /><category term="frankenstein" label="frankenstein"
 /><category term="george stevens" label="george stevens"
 /><category term="giant" label="giant"
 /><category term="gilda" label="gilda"
 /><category term="high noon" label="high noon"
 /><category term="his girl friday" label="his girl friday"
 /><category term="in a lonely place" label="in a lonely place"
 /><category term="it should happen to you" label="it should happen to you"
 /><category term="it's a wonderful life" label="it's a wonderful life"
 /><category term="james cameron" label="james cameron"
 /><category term="jaws" label="jaws"
 /><category term="john cazale" label="john cazale"
 /><category term="john huston" label="john huston"
 /><category term="king kong" label="king kong"
 /><category term="lord of the rings: return of the king" label="lord of the rings: return of the king"
 /><category term="marx brothers" label="marx brothers"
 /><category term="mash" label="mash"
 /><category term="midnight cowboy" label="midnight cowboy"
 /><category term="modern times" label="modern times"
 /><category term="movies" label="movies"
 /><category term="mutiny on the bounty" label="mutiny on the bounty"
 /><category term="north by northwest" label="north by northwest"
 /><category term="notorious" label="notorious"
 /><category term="omar sharif" label="omar sharif"
 /><category term="one flew over the cuckoo's nest" label="one flew over the cuckoo's nest"
 /><category term="platoon" label="platoon"
 /><category term="rear window" label="rear window"
 /><category term="reds" label="reds"
 /><category term="robert altman" label="robert altman"
 /><category term="roman holiday" label="roman holiday"
 /><category term="sam peckinpah" label="sam peckinpah"
 /><category term="saving private ryan" label="saving private ryan"
 /><category term="shane" label="shane"
 /><category term="some like it hot" label="some like it hot"
 /><category term="spartacus" label="spartacus"
 /><category term="steven spielberg" label="steven spielberg"
 /><category term="sullivan's travels" label="sullivan's travels"
 /><category term="summer movie watch" label="summer movie watch"
 /><category term="sunrise" label="sunrise"
 /><category term="sunset boulevard" label="sunset boulevard"
 /><category term="swing time" label="swing time"
 /><category term="the apartment" label="the apartment"
 /><category term="the bridge on the river kwai" label="the bridge on the river kwai"
 /><category term="the deer hunter" label="the deer hunter"
 /><category term="the general" label="the general"
 /><category term="the godfather" label="the godfather"
 /><category term="the graduate" label="the graduate"
 /><category term="the maltese falcon" label="the maltese falcon"
 /><category term="the manchurian candidate" label="the manchurian candidate"
 /><category term="the palm beach story" label="the palm beach story"
 /><category term="the philadelphia story" label="the philadelphia story"
 /><category term="the shop around the corner" label="the shop around the corner"
 /><category term="van heflin" label="van heflin"
 /><content type="xhtml"
><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
>
<img alt="AFI logo.jpg" src="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2009/08/22/AFI%20logo.jpg" width="179" height="197" /> Earlier, 
<a href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2009/08/03/entertainment_weeklys_100_new_classics_summed_up">I wrote a sum-up</a> of my experience with 
<em>Entertainment Weekly</em>'s 
<a href="http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,20207076_20207387_20207063,00.html">100 New Classics</a> list. I'm finally following up with a sum-up of the AFI lists! Here's how I felt about the AFI lists: 
<strong>Least enjoyed</strong>: 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0026778/">
<em>A Night at the Opera</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0023969/">
<em>Duck Soup</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0066026/">
<em>MASH</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0026752/">
<em>Mutiny on the Bounty</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0073486/">
<em>One Flew Over the Cuckoo&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s Nest</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0091763/">
<em>Platoon</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0046303/">
<em>Shane</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0018455/">
<em>Sunrise</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0028333/">
<em>Swing Time</em>
</a> 
<strong>Most enjoyed</strong>: 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0050083/">
<em>12 Angry Men</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0021749/">
<em>City Lights</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0059113/">
<em>Doctor Zhivago</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0049261/">
<em>Giant</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0044706/">
<em>High Noon</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0024216/">
<em>King Kong</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0064665/">
<em>Midnight Cowboy</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0027977/">
<em>Modern Times</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0054331/">
<em>Spartacus</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0034240/">
<em>Sullivan&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s Travels</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0050212/">
<em>The Bridge on the River Kwai</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0077416/">
<em>The Deer Hunter</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0068646/">
<em>The Godfather</em>
</a> 
<strong>Pre-list favorites</strong>: 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0042192/">
<em>All About Eve</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0069704/">
<em>American Graffiti</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0034583/">
<em>Casablanca</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0057012/">
<em>Dr. Strangelove</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0116282/">
<em>Fargo</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0073195/">
<em>Jaws</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0053125/">
<em>North by Northwest</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0047396/">
<em>Rear Window</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0043014/">
<em>Sunset Boulevard</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0053604/">
<em>The Apartment</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0061722/">
<em>The Graduate</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0033870/">
<em>The Maltese Falcon</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0056218/">
<em>The Manchurian Candidate</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0032904/">
<em>The Philadelphia Story</em>
</a> Other than the movies themselves, which of course were all new to me, I saw some interesting actors for the first time, notably 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001336/">Van Heflin</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001030/">John Cazale</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001725/">Omar Sharif</a>, and 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0942039/">Fay Wray</a>. This was also my first exposure to directors 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000186/">David Lynch</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0828419/">George Stevens</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000428/">D.W. Griffith</a> and 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001603/">Sam Peckinpah</a>. The Summer Movie Watch necessitated my first (and last) two 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000050/">Marx brothers</a> movie viewings. It&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s harder for me to name all the movies I think should have been on the AFI list and that weren&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t than it is for me to say what should have been on the 
<em>EW</em> list. This is simply because I have seen fewer films from the 30s, 40s, 50s, 60s and 70s than from the 80s, the 90s and the 00s. I can&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t help when I was born, after all. But I have seen enough that I put together this short list of notable omissions: 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0046250/">
<em>Roman Holiday</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0035169/">
<em>The Palm Beach Story</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0038787/">
<em>Notorious</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0032599/">
<em>His Girl Friday</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0056923/">
<em>Charade</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0042276/">
<em>Born Yesterday</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0047123/">
<em>It Should Happen to You</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0055728/">
<em>Advise and Consent</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0037558/">
<em>Brief Encounter</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0038559/">
<em>Gilda</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0033045/">
<em>The Shop Around the Corner</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0042593/">
<em>In a Lonely Place</em>
</a>, and 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0082979/">
<em>Reds</em>
</a>. As far as I know, all of these films were eligible for inclusion with the possible exception of 
<em>Brief Encounter</em>, which is officially a British film (but then so is 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0056172/">
<em>Lawrence of Arabia</em>
</a>, 
<em>River Kwai</em>, and several others that the AFI didn&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t mind taking credit for, so&#226;&#8364;&#166;). 
<strong>Other list factoids</strong>: The AFI list presented me with the three shortest and the two longest movies I viewed: 
<em>Lawrence of Arabia</em> at 216 minutes and 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0052618/">
<em>Ben-Hur</em>
</a> at 212 minutes were the longest (the next longest was a tie, with 
<em>Giant</em> and 
<em>EW</em>&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0167260/">
<em>Lord of the Rings: Return of the King</em>
</a> at 201 minutes each, and no, that&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s not even the 
<em>extended edition</em> of 
<em>LOTR</em>). The shortest movie I watched was 
<em>Duck Soup</em> at just 68 minutes (68 long minutes, because Marx brothers 
<em>sheesh</em>), then 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0021884/">
<em>Frankenstein</em>
</a> at 70 minutes and 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0017925/">
<em>The General</em>
</a> at 75. The dates on those movies&#226;&#8364;&#8221;1933, 1931, and 1926 respectively&#226;&#8364;&#8221;are telling. Movies were shorter back then both because of the technology (innovations in film production made filmmaking basics easier and quicker, for example) and because movies were frequently shown in double and triple features. People spent a lot more time at the movies before they had TVs in their homes. The most represented director on both versions of the AFI list is 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000229/">Steven Spielberg</a> with 5 films. The second list swaps out 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0075860/">
<em>Close Encounters</em>
</a> for 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120815/">
<em>Saving Private Ryan</em>
</a> (which was made the same year as the first list was released). I had already seen 4 of the first 5 and 3 of the second 5, so I actually only watched 2 Spielberg movies throughout the movie watch. The next two most represented directors are 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000033/">Alfred Hitchcock</a> and 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000697/">Billy Wilder</a>, each with the same four films appearing on both lists. These are two of my absolute favorite directors, and I had seen all four of both sets of films. In fact, I believe I once watched three of Wilder&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s (
<em>Sunset Boulevard</em>, 
<em>The Apartment</em>, and 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0053291/">
<em>Some Like it Hot</em>
</a>) all in a row one rainy Sunday afternoon. I had also seen all three of the 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001008/">Frank Capra</a> movies on the lists, and all three of the 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001379/">John Huston</a> films. The most represented director on my movie watch was George Stevens, who had four movies on the two lists, none of which I had seen, and then 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000265/">Robert Altman</a> and 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000180/">David Lean</a>, each with three movies I hadn't seen. One thing I noticed is that only one director (
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000116/">James Cameron</a>) had 3 or more films on the 
<em>EW</em> list, compared to the several who had 3 and 4 on the AFI lists&#226;&#8364;&#8221;and, of course, Senor Spielbergo with 5. I can draw the conclusion that the 
<em>EW</em> list is more deliberately diverse than the AFI lists, or just reflect that the film industry has grown exponentially in every direction in the last twenty-five years and there was just more for 
<em>EW</em> to choose from. Probably both are somewhat true. The 
<em>EW</em> list skewed my decade stats; I saw the most movies from the 80s and 90s simply because the 
<em>EW</em> list added an extra hundred of them to the total. For the AFI list, I watched films mostly from the 1970s, the 1960s and the 1930s. I needed to watch only two movies from the 1940s, considered by many to be the Golden Age of Hollywood, and well-represented on the list, because I had seen the majority of them already (
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0033467/">
<em>Citizen Kane</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0038650/">
<em>It&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s a Wonderful Life</em>
</a>, 
<em>Casablanca</em>: already familiar). Popular genres on the AFI lists are war movies and musicals, with a handful of westerns and mob movies. A lot of my favorites are the more unclassifiable ones: 
<em>The Apartment</em>. 
<em>Fargo</em>. 
<em>All About Eve</em>. 
<em>The Philadelphia Story</em>. Are these dramas? Comedies? I classify my absolute favorite genre of film as &#226;&#8364;&#339;the poignant comedy.&#226;&#8364; I wish it occurred more often in nature.</div
></content
><author
><name
>Erin Wolverton</name
><email
>erin.wolverton@case.edu</email
><uri
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal</uri
></author
></entry
><entry
><title
>Entertainment Weekly's 100 New Classics: Summed Up</title
><link href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2009/08/03/entertainment_weeklys_100_new_classics_summed_up"
 /><id
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2009/08/03/entertainment_weeklys_100_new_classics_summed_up</id
><published
>2009-08-03T22:02:52Z</published
><updated
>2010-10-04T02:51:42Z</updated
><category term="a room with a view" label="a room with a view"
 /><category term="alfonso cuaron" label="alfonso cuaron"
 /><category term="amy heckerling" label="amy heckerling"
 /><category term="ang lee" label="ang lee"
 /><category term="back to the future" label="back to the future"
 /><category term="big" label="big"
 /><category term="blue velvet" label="blue velvet"
 /><category term="brokeback mountain" label="brokeback mountain"
 /><category term="clueless" label="clueless"
 /><category term="coen brothers" label="coen brothers"
 /><category term="crouching tiger hidden dragon" label="crouching tiger hidden dragon"
 /><category term="directors" label="directors"
 /><category term="donnie brasco" label="donnie brasco"
 /><category term="drugstore cowboy" label="drugstore cowboy"
 /><category term="ed wood" label="ed wood"
 /><category term="edward scissorhands" label="edward scissorhands"
 /><category term="entertainment weekly" label="entertainment weekly"
 /><category term="eternal sunshine of the spotless mind" label="eternal sunshine of the spotless mind"
 /><category term="evil dead 2" label="evil dead 2"
 /><category term="fargo" label="fargo"
 /><category term="fatal attraction" label="fatal attraction"
 /><category term="ghostbusters" label="ghostbusters"
 /><category term="glory" label="glory"
 /><category term="hannah and her sisters" label="hannah and her sisters"
 /><category term="hollywood sexism" label="hollywood sexism"
 /><category term="in the mood for love" label="in the mood for love"
 /><category term="it's a wonderful life" label="it's a wonderful life"
 /><category term="james cameron" label="james cameron"
 /><category term="jane campion" label="jane campion"
 /><category term="la confidential" label="la confidential"
 /><category term="lost in translation" label="lost in translation"
 /><category term="martin scorsese" label="martin scorsese"
 /><category term="memento" label="memento"
 /><category term="men in black" label="men in black"
 /><category term="moulin rouge" label="moulin rouge"
 /><category term="movies" label="movies"
 /><category term="natural born killers" label="natural born killers"
 /><category term="office space" label="office space"
 /><category term="paul thomas anderson" label="paul thomas anderson"
 /><category term="penny marshall" label="penny marshall"
 /><category term="peter weir" label="peter weir"
 /><category term="ridley scott" label="ridley scott"
 /><category term="rob reiner" label="rob reiner"
 /><category term="rushmore" label="rushmore"
 /><category term="sam raimi" label="sam raimi"
 /><category term="schindler's list" label="schindler's list"
 /><category term="shrek" label="shrek"
 /><category term="sofia coppola" label="sofia coppola"
 /><category term="steven spielberg" label="steven spielberg"
 /><category term="summer movie watch" label="summer movie watch"
 /><category term="the 40-year-old virgin" label="the 40-year-old virgin"
 /><category term="the dark knight" label="the dark knight"
 /><category term="the incredibles" label="the incredibles"
 /><category term="the lives of others" label="the lives of others"
 /><category term="the naked gun" label="the naked gun"
 /><category term="the piano" label="the piano"
 /><category term="the silence of the lambs" label="the silence of the lambs"
 /><category term="the truman show" label="the truman show"
 /><category term="thelma and louise" label="thelma and louise"
 /><category term="tim burton" label="tim burton"
 /><category term="titanic" label="titanic"
 /><category term="vicky jenson" label="vicky jenson"
 /><category term="witness" label="witness"
 /><category term="zodiac" label="zodiac"
 /><content type="xhtml"
><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
>
<img alt="EW new classics.jpg" src="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2009/06/29/EW%20new%20classics.jpg" width="463" height="71" /> I&#226;&#8364;&#8482;m coming closer and closer to finishing up the AFI lists&#226;&#8364;&#8221;with the most minimal effort it will happen this week&#226;&#8364;&#8221;but before that happens I thought I would sum up 
<a href="http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,20207076_20207387_20207063,00.html">the 
<em>EW</em> list</a> with my two favorite things, opinions and statistics. Here&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s how I felt about the list: 
<strong>Least enjoyed</strong>: 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0090756/">
<em>Blue Velvet</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0097240/">
<em>Drugstore Cowboy</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0092991/">
<em>Evil Dead 2</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0093010/">
<em>Fatal Attraction</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0110632/">
<em>Natural Born Killers</em>
</a> 
<strong>Most enjoyed</strong>: 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0091867/">
<em>A Room with a View</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0388795/">
<em>Brokeback Mountain</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0190332/">
<em>Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0109707/">
<em>Ed Wood</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0097441/">
<em>Glory</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0091167/">
<em>Hannah and Her Sisters</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0118694/">
<em>In the Mood for Love</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0108052/">
<em>Schindler&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s List</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0317705/">
<em>The Incredibles</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0405094/">
<em>The Lives of Others</em>
</a> 
<strong>Most enjoyed (pre-list favorites)</strong>: 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0088763/">
<em>Back to the Future</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0112697/">
<em>Clueless</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0119008/">
<em>Donnie Brasco</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0099487/">
<em>Edward Scissorhands</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0338013/">
<em>Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0116282/">
<em>Fargo</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0087332/">
<em>Ghostbusters</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0119488/">
<em>L.A. Confidential</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0335266/">
<em>Lost in Translation</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0209144/">
<em>Memento</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0119654/">
<em>Men in Black</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0203009/">
<em>Moulin Rouge</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0151804/">
<em>Office Space</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0128445/">
<em>Rushmore</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0405422/">
<em>The 40-Year-Old Virgin</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0095705/">
<em>The Naked Gun</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0102926/">
<em>The Silence of the Lambs</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120382/">
<em>The Truman Show</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0103074/">
<em>Thelma and Louise</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0090329/">
<em>Witness</em>
</a> Additionally, I&#226;&#8364;&#8482;ve been compiling a list of 
<strong>Notable Omissions</strong>--movies which were released between &#226;&#8364;&#8482;83 and &#226;&#8364;&#8482;07, and thus eligible for the list, but which are unaccountably absent. The list will appear in a future entry (or, if it keeps expanding, in two of them). Here&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s some stats that interested me: The breakdown of the list by decade is 30 films from the 1980s, 45 from the 1990s and 25 from the 2000s. Even so, the majority of the films I watched were from the 1980s, which is easily enough explained: while my movie coverage has been adequate in the &#226;&#8364;&#732;90s and &#226;&#8364;&#732;00s, I&#226;&#8364;&#8482;m still playing catch-up to movies that came out when I was a child. The directors whose films I watched the most of were 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000229/">Steven Spielberg</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000487/">Ang Lee</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0190859/">Alfonso Cuaron</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000600/">Sam Raimi</a> and 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000116/">James Cameron</a>, at 2 films each. Cameron actually had 3 films on the list, but I had already seen 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120338/">
<em>Titanic</em>
</a> (January 1997, the afternoon after I took my SATs, in case anyone cares). Other twice-appearing directors were 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000318/">Tim Burton</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001661/">Rob Reiner</a>, and 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000759/">Paul Thomas Anderson</a>--each of whom had one movie I had seen previously and one movie which I watched this summer for the list--and 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000217/">Martin Scorsese</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001837/">Peter Weir</a>, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000631/">Ridley Scott</a> and the 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001054/">Coen</a> 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001053/">brothers</a>, each of whom had two films I had already seen. One benefit of the 
<em>EW</em> list which 
<a href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2009/07/03/reviews_foreign_films">I have mentioned previously</a> is that its horizons extended beyond American-made movies. Another feature of the list, which I didn&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t notice until I began compiling these stats yesterday, is that the 
<em>EW</em> list includes female directors--only five of them, but that still trounces either AFI list at zero and zero, respectively. Three of the female-helmed movies were massive hits: 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0126029/">
<em>Shrek</em>
</a> (co-directed by 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0421776/">Vicky Jenson</a> and Andrew Adamson), 
<em>Clueless</em> (
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0002132/">Amy Heckerling</a>) and 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0094737/">
<em>Big</em>
</a> (
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001508/">Penny Marshall</a>). I had seen all of those movies, multiple times on multiple occasions. The other two were critical darlings, and represent the only two Oscar nominations for Best Director that have ever happened to women. 
<em>Ever</em>. [
<em>Edited to add: I have since checked IMDb and realized that I misread Jane Campion's biography. One other woman received a Best Director Oscar nomination, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0921631/">Lina Wertmuller</a> in 1975. My indignance is, I think, still warranted.</em>] Those movies are 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0107822/">
<em>The Piano</em>
</a> (
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001005/">Jane Campion</a>, in 1994&#226;&#8364;&#8221;this was a list movie) and 
<em>Lost in Translation</em> (
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001068/">Sofia Coppola</a>, in 2004, already seen). Though neither woman won the directing award, both took home the same consolation prize: Best Original Screenplay. At this rate, another woman should be due to lose Best Director in another five years. That&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s not a fault of the list, of course, but of Hollywood standards in general. One final observation: the 
<em>Entertainment Weekly</em> list feels, in general, darker and more gothic than the AFI lists. It seems densely populated with drug movies, mob movies, serial killer movies, sci-fi creature-on-the-loose movies. I don&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t think this is necessarily because those darker genres are being made more of today. Look again at 
<a href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2009/08/02/movie_reviews_hollywood_satires">my 
<em>Ed Wood</em> entry</a> and all those movies Bela Lugosi made. The difference is that genre movies are becoming increasingly more respected; probably Francis Ford Coppola started things off by making 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0068646/">operatic mob movies</a> (
<a href="http://www.filmsite.org/crimefilms.html">popular since the 1930s</a>) which so effectively utilized the concept of the American dream that the Corleones became a part of our cultural fabric. These days, any serious director can make a critically-acclaimed crime movie (see last summer&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0468569/">
<em>The Dark Knight</em>
</a>, or, from two summers ago, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0443706/">
<em>Zodiac</em>
</a>). On the flip side, so-called &#226;&#8364;&#339;feelgood&#226;&#8364; movies are losing respect. Too many brainless romantic comedies which force two patently unlikeable characters to kiss in the rain and get married as the end credits roll, too many of those disposable kids&#226;&#8364;&#8482; movies where the kid discovers his dog can fly and that helps him stand up against a bully, or whatever. Basically, it&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s hard to scrounge up the sincerity that elevates a movie like 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0038650/">
<em>It&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s a Wonderful Life</em>
</a> above its Hallmark-y premise, and they just don&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t do it that much anymore.</div
></content
><author
><name
>Erin Wolverton</name
><email
>erin.wolverton@case.edu</email
><uri
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal</uri
></author
></entry
><entry
><title
>Some Thoughts About EW's 100 New Classics list</title
><link href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2009/06/29/some_thoughts_about_ews_100_new_classics_list"
 /><id
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2009/06/29/some_thoughts_about_ews_100_new_classics_list</id
><published
>2009-06-29T15:49:31Z</published
><updated
>2010-10-04T03:20:25Z</updated
><category term="back to the future" label="back to the future"
 /><category term="blue velvet" label="blue velvet"
 /><category term="christian bale" label="christian bale"
 /><category term="entertainment weekly" label="entertainment weekly"
 /><category term="evil dead 2" label="evil dead 2"
 /><category term="fatal attraction" label="fatal attraction"
 /><category term="julia roberts" label="julia roberts"
 /><category term="lost in translation" label="lost in translation"
 /><category term="movies" label="movies"
 /><category term="mystery science theater 3000" label="mystery science theater 3000"
 /><category term="pretty woman" label="pretty woman"
 /><category term="sam raimi" label="sam raimi"
 /><category term="sideways" label="sideways"
 /><category term="spider-man 2" label="spider-man 2"
 /><category term="summer movie watch" label="summer movie watch"
 /><category term="the matrix" label="the matrix"
 /><content type="xhtml"
><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
>
<img alt="EW new classics.jpg" src="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2009/06/29/EW%20new%20classics.jpg" width="463" height="71" /> I watched 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0092991/">
<em>Evil Dead 2</em>
</a> last night, which was a singularly terrible experience. I won't go into too much detail about the movie itself other than to say that watching it was not unlike watching one of the many pieces of trash I used to see on 
<em>Mystery Science Theater 3000</em> on Saturday mornings, the only difference being that the hilarious commentary provided by Mike and the robots which made the movies watchable was missing. (Click 
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BOCqlKNW9rU">here</a> for a clip, if you're uninitiated in the wonders of MST3K and you have no idea what I'm talking about.) Anyway, this terrible movie, which 
<em>Entertainment Weekly</em> considers the 83rd best movie of the last 25 years (nestled comfortably between Oscar-baits 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0335266/">
<em>Lost in Translation</em>
</a> and 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0375063/">
<em>Sideways</em>
</a>, and a full eight spots above legitimate classic 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0088763/">
<em>Back to the Future</em>
</a>) prompted me to think about 
<a href="http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,20207076_20207387_20207063,00.html">the 
<em>EW</em> list</a>, and to question why so many of the movies I have hated watching have come from this list. The one thing I've continually said about all these movies I didn't like--
<a href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2009/06/22/movie_reviews_men_versus_women_edition">
<em>Fatal Attraction</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2009/05/29/reviews_all_about_action">
<em>Spider-Man</em> 2</a>--and the ones I already knew I didn't like--this is where 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0133093/">
<em>The Matrix</em>
</a> and 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0100405/">
<em>Pretty Woman</em>
</a> come in--is that they're iconic. They're movies people know and recognize. I hate 
<em>Pretty Woman</em>, but I would never argue that other people didn't love it, or that Julia Robert's performance wasn't star-making. And I know that 
<em>Evil Dead 2</em> is a cult film, loved by horror geeks for its potent combo platter of slapstick and gore. What the 
<em>Entertainment Weekly</em> list has not promised, so far, is well-crafted movies. Movies that make sense, with stories that hold together, with strong performances, with sure-handed direction. Those movies have occurred on the list, you understand, but they are not guaranteed like on the 
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AFI%27s_100_Years..._100_Movies">AFI</a> 
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AFI%27s_100_Years..._100_Movies_(10th_Anniversary_Edition)">lists</a>. It's good that I know that now, so I can manage my expectations going in to the next one, which is, frighteningly, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0090756/">
<em>Blue Velvet</em>
</a>. By the way, besides being the writer-director for the travesty that was 
<em>Evil Dead 2</em>, Sam Raimi also produced and directed 
<a href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2009/05/29/reviews_all_about_action">the Spider-Man movies</a>. I feel pretty confident that I can write this guy's movies off as "not to my taste" from now on--or, in 
<a href="http://theoriginalunoriginal.com/2009/02/03/transcript-of-chirstian-bales-terminator-salvation-flip-out/">the immortal words of Christian Bale</a>, "you and me, we're f***ing done professionally," Mr. Raimi.</div
></content
><author
><name
>Erin Wolverton</name
><email
>erin.wolverton@case.edu</email
><uri
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal</uri
></author
></entry
><entry
><title
>Summer project!</title
><link href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2009/05/19/summer_project"
 /><id
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2009/05/19/summer_project</id
><published
>2009-05-19T08:20:56Z</published
><updated
>2010-10-04T03:41:50Z</updated
><category term="american film institute" label="american film institute"
 /><category term="entertainment weekly" label="entertainment weekly"
 /><category term="goals" label="goals"
 /><category term="movies" label="movies"
 /><category term="oscars" label="oscars"
 /><category term="projects" label="projects"
 /><category term="saving private ryan" label="saving private ryan"
 /><category term="schindler's list" label="schindler's list"
 /><category term="shakespeare in love" label="shakespeare in love"
 /><category term="stagecoach" label="stagecoach"
 /><category term="summer movie watch" label="summer movie watch"
 /><category term="terminator 2" label="terminator 2"
 /><category term="unforgiven" label="unforgiven"
 /><content type="xhtml"
><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
>
<img alt="movie reel.jpg" src="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2009/05/19/movie%20reel.jpg" width="120" height="150" /> As people who know me know, I am a huge follower of award shows, and of &#226;&#8364;&#339;best of&#226;&#8364; lists. I love to see stuff ranked, and to see quality get celebrated (or even debated: I&#226;&#8364;&#8482;ve argued with a good many people over the years about 
<a href="http://www.ew.com/ew/gallery/0,,20007870_20164474_20250883_8,00.html">whether 
<em>Shakespeare in Love</em> should have bested 
<em>Saving Private Ryan</em> for Best Picture at the Oscars back in &#226;&#8364;&#8482;98</a>). Award shows and &#226;&#8364;&#339;best of&#226;&#8364; lists are great guides for someone who wants to actively seek out movies with great reputations. One of the best movie list-makers is the 
<a href="http://www.afi.com/tvevents/100years/movies.aspx">American Film Institute</a>. They release a new list pretty much every year (they&#226;&#8364;&#8482;ve done 100 Best Comedies, 100 Best Characters, etc.) and they have two 100 Best American Films lists, the original from 1998, and then a revision in 2007. The difference between the two lists is 23 films, some of which were movies that people thought had been overlooked, and some of which first appeared after 1998 (for example, 
<em>
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120815/">Saving Private Ryan</a>
</em>, mentioned above). 
<em>Entertainment Weekly</em> also has a 100 Best list, but they do not compete with the AFI; the 
<em>Entertainment Weekly</em> list is &#226;&#8364;&#339;new classics,&#226;&#8364; all films originating in the 25 years between 1983 and 2008. I am a notorious goal-setter and list-maker, and these kinds of lists indulge both of those attributes (or flaws, depending on how you run your life). So, the first in a series of goals I&#226;&#8364;&#8482;ll be releasing out into cyberspace (check back on my birthday for more) is this: see 91 specific movies, the ones missing from those three lists, and thus become master of three &#226;&#8364;&#339;best of&#226;&#8364; lists. Before I began the project, my record was as follows:
<blockquote>AFI 1998: seen 58, not seen 42
<br />AFI 2007: seen 54, not seen 46
<br />EW: seen 61, not seen 39</blockquote>With overlap (
<em>
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0108052/">Schindler&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s List</a>
</em> and 
<em>
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0105695/">Unforgiven</a>
</em> are two movies I haven&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t seen, which both appear on all three lists; some other movies appear on two) the number of movies I need to watch to lay waste to these lists is 91. I created 
<a href="https://filer.case.edu/elw49/summermoviewatch/">a website</a> where I&#226;&#8364;&#8482;m tracking my progress; I've linked it on the sidebar as well. I&#226;&#8364;&#8482;m off to a pretty good start, having seen five new movies since my summer vacation began. Am I serious about this? Well, I watched 
<em>
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0031971/">Stagecoach</a>
</em> last week, and 
<em>
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0103064/">Terminator 2</a>
</em>. That's serious!</div
></content
><author
><name
>Erin Wolverton</name
><email
>erin.wolverton@case.edu</email
><uri
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal</uri
></author
></entry
></feed
>
