<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/topics-files/atom2xhtml.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<!-- This is a 512 byte XML comment that one must put into XML Atom feeds
such that browsers like Firefox 2.0 and IE7 will obey the XSL stylesheet.
Everybody hates overbearing browsers.
This is a 512 byte XML comment that one must put into XML Atom feeds
such that browsers like Firefox 2.0 and IE7 will obey the XSL stylesheet.
Everybody hates overbearing browsers.
This is a 512 byte XML comment that one must put into XML Atom feeds
such that browsers like Firefox 2.0 and IE7 will obey the XSL stylesheet.
Everybody hates overbearing browsers.
This is a 512 byte XML comment that one must put into XML Atom feeds
such that browsers like Firefox 2.0 and IE7 will obey the XSL stylesheet.
Everybody hates overbearing browsers.
This is a 512 byte XML comment that one must put into XML Atom feeds
such that browsers like Firefox 2.0 and IE7 will obey the XSL stylesheet.
Everybody hates overbearing browsers.
This is a 512 byte XML comment that one must put into XML Atom feeds
such that browsers like Firefox 2.0 and IE7 will obey the XSL stylesheet.
Everybody hates overbearing browsers. -->
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
><title
>Blog@Case Topics: movies</title
><link rel="self" href="http://blog.case.edu/topics/movies"
 /><id
>http://blog.case.edu/topics/movies</id
><category term="movies" label="movies"
 /><link rel="related" href="http://blog.case.edu/topics/summer%20movie%20watch" title="summer movie watch"
 /><link rel="related" href="http://blog.case.edu/topics/tv" title="tv"
 /><link rel="related" href="http://blog.case.edu/topics/podcasts" title="podcasts"
 /><link rel="related" href="http://blog.case.edu/topics/video%20games" title="video games"
 /><link rel="related" href="http://blog.case.edu/topics/epic%20wednesday" title="epic wednesday"
 /><link rel="related" href="http://blog.case.edu/topics/podcast" title="podcast"
 /><link rel="related" href="http://blog.case.edu/topics/schindler's%20list" title="schindler's list"
 /><link rel="related" href="http://blog.case.edu/topics/one%20flew%20over%20the%20cuckoo's%20nest" title="one flew over the cuckoo's nest"
 /><link rel="related" href="http://blog.case.edu/topics/accomplishments" title="accomplishments"
 /><link rel="related" href="http://blog.case.edu/topics/oscars" title="oscars"
 /><link rel="related" href="http://blog.case.edu/topics/the%20simpsons" title="the simpsons"
 /><contributor
><name
>Nicholas Kosareo</name
><email
>nicholas.kosareo@case.edu</email
><uri
>http://blog.case.edu/kosareo</uri
></contributor
><contributor
><name
>Erin Wolverton</name
><email
>erin.wolverton@case.edu</email
><uri
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal</uri
></contributor
><updated
>2007-05-13T21:04:11Z</updated
><entry
><title
>From what I understand, the seventies were all about serial killers and neckerchiefs</title
><link href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/04/26/from_what_i_understand_the_seventies_were_all_about_serial_killers_and_neckerchiefs"
 /><id
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/04/26/from_what_i_understand_the_seventies_were_all_about_serial_killers_and_neckerchiefs</id
><published
>2010-04-26T18:55:50Z</published
><updated
>2010-10-03T23:46:04Z</updated
><category term="clothes" label="clothes"
 /><category term="inglourious basterds" label="inglourious basterds"
 /><category term="movies" label="movies"
 /><category term="tomato nation" label="tomato nation"
 /><category term="zodiac" label="zodiac"
 /><content type="xhtml"
><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
>Hey, you know what's one of my favorite movies? I mean literally? 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0443706/">
<em>Zodiac</em>
</a>. Just the other day someone asked me what I thought was the best movie that came out in the last 5 to 10 years. It might have been a toss-up between 
<em>Zodiac</em> and 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0361748/">
<em>Inglourious Basterds</em>
</a>, but then I gave it to 
<em>Zodiac</em> because I haven't gotten around to re-watching 
<em>Basterds</em> yet, but I love 
<em>Zodiac</em> SO MUCH I burned it to my computer so I can watch it all the time. So that was all just a preamble to this (enjoy): 
<embed src="http://blip.tv/play/AYHYugUC" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="350" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" /> 
<em>From 
<a href="http://tomatonation.com/">Tomato Nation</a></em></div
></content
><author
><name
>Erin Wolverton</name
><email
>erin.wolverton@case.edu</email
><uri
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal</uri
></author
></entry
><entry
><title
>Hey, did you hear they're remaking Gladiator?</title
><link href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/04/22/hey_did_you_hear_theyre_remaking_gladiator"
 /><id
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/04/22/hey_did_you_hear_theyre_remaking_gladiator</id
><published
>2010-04-22T05:31:59Z</published
><updated
>2010-10-03T23:47:02Z</updated
><category term="gladiator" label="gladiator"
 /><category term="movies" label="movies"
 /><category term="ridley scott" label="ridley scott"
 /><category term="robin hood" label="robin hood"
 /><category term="russell crowe" label="russell crowe"
 /><content type="xhtml"
><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
>This time it's called 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0955308/">
<em>Robin Hood</em>
</a>. 
<object width="560" height="340">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/RIy9tRG15sQ&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" />
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/RIy9tRG15sQ&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340" />
</object></div
></content
><author
><name
>Erin Wolverton</name
><email
>erin.wolverton@case.edu</email
><uri
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal</uri
></author
></entry
><entry
><title
>Life-Changing Art</title
><link href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/04/17/lifechanging_art"
 /><id
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/04/17/lifechanging_art</id
><published
>2010-04-17T17:23:11Z</published
><updated
>2010-10-03T23:49:09Z</updated
><category term="TV" label="TV"
 /><category term="ang lee" label="ang lee"
 /><category term="arrested development" label="arrested development"
 /><category term="books" label="books"
 /><category term="flannery o'connor" label="flannery o'connor"
 /><category term="high school" label="high school"
 /><category term="movies" label="movies"
 /><category term="pulp fiction" label="pulp fiction"
 /><category term="sense and sensibility" label="sense and sensibility"
 /><category term="the av club" label="the av club"
 /><category term="the philadelphia story" label="the philadelphia story"
 /><content type="xhtml"
><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
>This morning, I was reading a fun story over at the AV Club: 
<a href="http://www.avclub.com/articles/lifechanging-art,40183/">Life-Changing Art</a> Some of the blog writers talk about works of literature, film, and art that changed their tastes fundamentally&#226;&#8364;&#8221;that made them say, &#226;&#8364;&#339;if a movie can do 
<em>this</em>, how can I be satisfied with a movie that does less?&#226;&#8364; and so on. And I have a few of those: 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0032904/">
<em>The Philadelphia Story</em>
</a>, 
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0374515360/comfortsofhome/">Flannery O'Connor</a>, 
<a href="http://www.hulu.com/arrested-development">
<em>Arrested Development</em>
</a>. But somehow, my immediate reaction to this question was to remember my experience with Ang Lee&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0114388/">
<em>Sense and Sensibility</em>
</a>. 
<img alt="sense and sensibility.jpg" src="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/04/17/sense%20and%20sensibility.jpg" width="438" height="246" /> It came out in 1995, when I was a freshman in high school. Even though I was already mostly an oddball, not interested in skating along with what was popular or cool, at fourteen I was still feeling a selective kind of peer pressure. I had my small group of friends, and I believed that my tastes needed to be in line with theirs. If I took a step in a direction they didn&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t agree with&#226;&#8364;&#8221;well, they would drop me like a hot potato, wouldn&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t they? When you&#226;&#8364;&#8482;re fourteen and everyone around you allies themselves based on shared tastes, liking the wrong thing is fatal. The logic is unimpeachable, so long as you haven&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t lived to know better. So anyway, one day I was watching TV with Jamie, my best friend at the time. A commercial came on for 
<em>Sense and Sensibility</em>, and it was all British, and full of straw hats and gowns and fancy dancing. Please be aware that this was 
<em>Pulp Fiction</em> times. Absolute baseline requirement for coolness at the time was subversion&#226;&#8364;&#8221;drugs and violence and swearing, the harsh, the crude, the angry. (I&#226;&#8364;&#8482;m talking of course about popular culture, because in our own lives we were totally suburban honor students.) And Jamie scoffed at the commercial, because Jane Austen was clearly a tool of The Man. Any movie you could see with your mom was officially lame. As it happened, I had seen 
<em>Sense and Sensibility</em> with my mom, and I had dug it immensely. And at that moment, all my teenage frustration and righteous anger&#226;&#8364;&#8221;and outright exhaustion with the effort of trying to keep up with who and what I was supposed to be&#226;&#8364;&#8221;overcame me, and do you know what I said? &#226;&#8364;&#339;I loved it. And I bought the book, and I&#226;&#8364;&#8482;m going to read it.&#226;&#8364; I didn&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t hedge, I didn&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t hesitate, I may have said it in the timid mouse-voice I was mostly using at the time, but damn if it didn&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t feel monumental. And Jamie? She considered for a moment, then shrugged and said, &#226;&#8364;&#339;That&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s cool.&#226;&#8364; And thus it started. Half my lifetime ago I came to a realization: if I 
<em>like</em> something, that&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s justification enough to like it! In fact, it&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s 
<em>cool</em> of me to be 
<em>sincere</em> about what I 
<em>feel!</em> It shows strength, and people respect it! And never again have I apologized for liking anything. My tastes&#226;&#8364;&#8221;broad and diverse&#226;&#8364;&#8221;are all a part of the strange and sometimes contradictory sum of me. I have sometimes gone almost too far in the opposite direction, sharing my opinions much too freely. I remember discussing movies with someone once, a person I didn&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t know that well, and getting a little bit too excited, and responding to one of their recommendations with, &#226;&#8364;&#339;No way&#226;&#8364;&#8221;that SUCKS,&#226;&#8364; and then having that person look at me very confused and insulted. I sometimes have to remind myself that not everyone communicates this way. But we all should! I&#226;&#8364;&#8482;d like to inspire everyone to express a controversial or embarrassing opinion about art today, and to not care what anyone else thinks about it.</div
></content
><author
><name
>Erin Wolverton</name
><email
>erin.wolverton@case.edu</email
><uri
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal</uri
></author
></entry
><entry
><title
>Eternal Sunshine and Remember?: The Same Concept Across a Few Generations</title
><link href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/04/09/eternal_sunshine_and_remember_the_same_concept_across_a_few_generations"
 /><id
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/04/09/eternal_sunshine_and_remember_the_same_concept_across_a_few_generations</id
><published
>2010-04-09T17:50:48Z</published
><updated
>2010-10-03T23:54:32Z</updated
><category term="bringing up baby" label="bringing up baby"
 /><category term="cary grant" label="cary grant"
 /><category term="charlie kaufman" label="charlie kaufman"
 /><category term="eternal sunshine of the spotless mind" label="eternal sunshine of the spotless mind"
 /><category term="favorites" label="favorites"
 /><category term="gone with the wind" label="gone with the wind"
 /><category term="greer garson" label="greer garson"
 /><category term="holiday" label="holiday"
 /><category term="jim carrey" label="jim carrey"
 /><category term="kate winslet" label="kate winslet"
 /><category term="katharine hepburn" label="katharine hepburn"
 /><category term="lew ayers" label="lew ayers"
 /><category term="michel gondry" label="michel gondry"
 /><category term="movies" label="movies"
 /><category term="nonlinear narratives" label="nonlinear narratives"
 /><category term="remember?" label="remember?"
 /><category term="robert taylor" label="robert taylor"
 /><category term="screwball comedies" label="screwball comedies"
 /><category term="stagecoach" label="stagecoach"
 /><category term="the wizard of oz" label="the wizard of oz"
 /><content type="xhtml"
><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
>So last week I watched this strange film called 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0031845/">
<em>Remember?</em>
</a> from 1939. The synopsis reminded me of one of my all-time favorites, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0338013/">
<em>Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind</em>
</a>&#226;&#8364;&#8221;in both films, former lovers utilize mind-erasing technology to forget each other&#226;&#8364;&#8221;and I was curious how such a postmodern concept was going to be executed circa 1939. What I found was that 
<em>Remember?</em> is not exactly the mind-bendingly awesome experience that 
<em>Eternal Sunshine</em> is, though there were interesting similarities. 
<img alt="remember.jpg" src="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/04/09/remember.jpg" width="288" height="213" /> Basically, what happens is this. Lew Ayers meets Greer Garson on vacation, gets quickly engaged to her and brings her home to meet his best buddy Robert Taylor. Of course, Taylor and Garson fall in love instead. Ayers has apparently not seen his own movie, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0030241/">
<em>Holiday</em>
</a>, in which almost the exact same thing happens when Cary Grant meets this woman on vacation, gets quickly engaged, and she brings him home to meet her sister, Katharine Hepburn, prompting Grant and Hepburn to fall in love (but, then, Ayers is the drunk brother in that movie, so that would account for him not remembering it). Anyway, Garson and Taylor fall in love and, with Ayers&#226;&#8364;&#8482; blessing, get married themselves. It doesn&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t work out, and they&#226;&#8364;&#8482;re soon divorced, but LUCKILY, Ayers and Taylor work for an advertising company that is developing a campaign for a forgetfulness serum. Ayers feeds the serum to his terribly depressed best friend&#226;&#8364;&#8221;and Garson gets a hold of it somehow, too, I forget how&#226;&#8364;&#8221;and, just like Joel and Clementine in 
<em>Eternal Sunshine</em>, the pair meet again and fall for each other again.</div
></content
><author
><name
>Erin Wolverton</name
><email
>erin.wolverton@case.edu</email
><uri
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal</uri
></author
></entry
><entry
><title
>Received in the mail today...</title
><link href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/04/05/received_in_the_mail_today"
 /><id
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/04/05/received_in_the_mail_today</id
><published
>2010-04-05T16:53:19Z</published
><updated
>2010-10-04T00:20:42Z</updated
><category term="TV" label="TV"
 /><category term="bed bath and beyond" label="bed bath and beyond"
 /><category term="it's always sunny in philadelphia" label="it's always sunny in philadelphia"
 /><category term="kill bill vol. 1" label="kill bill vol. 1"
 /><category term="kill bill vol. 2" label="kill bill vol. 2"
 /><category term="ma exam" label="ma exam"
 /><category term="movies" label="movies"
 /><category term="rewards" label="rewards"
 /><category term="scarface (1932)" label="scarface (1932)"
 /><category term="site stuff" label="site stuff"
 /><content type="xhtml"
><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
>
<ul>
<li>From Netflix: 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0023427/">
<em>Scarface, the Shame of the Nation</em> (1932)</a></li>
<li style="list-style: none">
<br />
</li>
<li>An ad for a local Jewish community center gym.</li>
<li style="list-style: none">
<br />
</li>
<li>Two coupons for Bed Bath and Beyond to throw on my preexisting pile of Bed Bath and Beyond coupons.</li>
<li style="list-style: none">
<br />
</li>
<li>Two boxes from Amazon! My "I passed my MA exam" celebration care package which I ordered for myself!
<ul>
<li>
<a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=qkwsrZl0jYQC&amp;printsec=frontcover&amp;dq=one+world+a+global+anthology+of+short+stories&amp;source=bl&amp;ots=aLEBRrEVaq&amp;sig=fhz3N3mTubdk71imtnu6EFpAkow&amp;hl=en&amp;ei=KAq6S-mEMYKBlAfA4eGVCg&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=book_result&amp;ct=result&amp;resnum=7&amp;ved=0CCkQ6AEwBg#v=onepage&amp;q=&amp;f=false">One book of short stories</a>
</li>
<li style="list-style: none">
<br />
</li>
<li>
<em>Kill Bill</em> vols. 1 and 2 on DVD (because, though I prefer vol. 2, to have only vol. 2 on DVD seemed incomplete)</li>
<li style="list-style: none">
<br />
</li>
<li>the third season of 
<em>It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia</em></li>
</ul>
<img alt="sunny-3.jpg" src="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/04/05/sunny-3.jpg" width="328" height="218" /></li>
</ul>I am really trying not to indulge in any of these care package entertainments right now. I should be working! Instead I am...wasting half the morning figuring out what code to use to nest a list inside a list. (Neat, hey?)</div
></content
><author
><name
>Erin Wolverton</name
><email
>erin.wolverton@case.edu</email
><uri
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal</uri
></author
></entry
><entry
><title
>No Use Lying in the Electronic Age</title
><link href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/03/27/no_use_lying_in_the_electronic_age"
 /><id
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/03/27/no_use_lying_in_the_electronic_age</id
><published
>2010-03-27T14:16:41Z</published
><updated
>2010-10-04T00:24:21Z</updated
><category term="TV" label="TV"
 /><category term="chloe sevigny" label="chloe sevigny"
 /><category term="daniel fienberg" label="daniel fienberg"
 /><category term="movies" label="movies"
 /><category term="sean o'neal" label="sean o'neal"
 /><category term="the av club" label="the av club"
 /><category term="the fien print" label="the fien print"
 /><content type="xhtml"
><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
>Oh, Chloe Sevigny! Caught red-handed! 
<img alt="chloe sevigny.jpg" src="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/03/27/chloe%20sevigny.jpg" width="214" height="326" /> Just a few days ago, the oddly fashionable actress 
<a href="http://www.avclub.com/articles/chloe-sevigny,39476/">did an interview</a> with Sean O'Neal of the AV Club, where she made some dismissive comments about the TV show 
<em>Big Love</em>. That's the show she's 
<em>on</em>, incidentally, the show for which 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001721/awards">she won a Golden Globe</a> this year. Well, O'Neal commented about the show being "over the top" in its most recent season, and she agreed with it, but more than that--she ran with it. She riffed on the question, talking about how "awful" it was, comparing it to a telenovela, ultimately finishing on this statement:
<blockquote>Oh God, I know. Oh, God. It&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s too much. It&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s too much. But I hope the fans will stick with us and tune in next year. There&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s a lot of people who really love this season, surprisingly. God, I&#226;&#8364;&#8482;m going to get in so much trouble. [Laughs.]</blockquote>Hey, she was right! She did get in trouble, and 
<a href="http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/2010/03/26/big-love-chloe-sevigny-apology-awful/">immediately announced</a> that she had been quoted out of context, that she was exhausted, that she didn't know what she was saying, and (this is my favorite) that she hadn't even 
<em>seen</em> the whole season yet because she doesn't have a TV. Well, that made everything all kittens and roses again--excepting for Sean O'Neal, who recorded the interview and 
<a href="http://www.avclub.com/articles/chloe-sevigny-apologizes-for-av-club-interview,39609/">posted a clip of it</a> on the AV Club site. Was Sevigny exhausted? Well, maybe. She kind of always sounds exhausted. 
<em>That's how she sounds</em>. Was she confused about the question? No, she and O'Neal bantered about it, there was back-and-forth. Did he "provoke" her into saying it? He did deride the show first. But she hasn't confessed to being under some magic spell which makes it impossible for her to disagree with things. Did she cross some professional boundary by making the comments? Well, that's less cut-and-dried. Don't bite the hand that feeds you and all that. There's a great 
<a href="http://www.hitfix.com/blogs/2008-12-6-the-fien-print/posts/celebrities-shouldn-t-need-to-apologize-for-having-opinions">rundown of the whole thing</a> at The Fien Print. Fienberg asks,
<blockquote>why is it acceptable for an actress to throw a professional journalist under the bus (pretty clearly without cause), but it's unacceptable for an actress to have a clearly articulated and intelligent point of view? Why can't Sevigny just be proud to be smart and opinionated?</blockquote>Good question. I agree that if an actress doesn't personally love and adore the show she happens to be on, it doesn't have to be a PR crisis. Do you think there's an actor anywhere who would declare, "I am in love with every project I ever took part in! Every movie I made is my 
<em>favorite</em> movie." Personal taste is variable. What does she really owe her show-runners other than turning in the best performance she can every week? She has to be the show's Number One Fan also? In my opinion, the most insulting thing she said was actually this line: "There&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s a lot of people who really love this season, surprisingly." That takes it out of the realm of "Chloe didn't like it," to "if you liked it you're stupid." But she hasn't apologized for that line. Interesting.</div
></content
><author
><name
>Erin Wolverton</name
><email
>erin.wolverton@case.edu</email
><uri
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal</uri
></author
></entry
><entry
><title
>In Praise of...Ginger Rogers!</title
><link href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/03/25/in_praise_ofginger_rogers"
 /><id
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/03/25/in_praise_ofginger_rogers</id
><published
>2010-03-26T01:24:52Z</published
><updated
>2010-10-04T00:25:23Z</updated
><category term="bachelor mother" label="bachelor mother"
 /><category term="fred astaire" label="fred astaire"
 /><category term="gail patrick" label="gail patrick"
 /><category term="gene kelly" label="gene kelly"
 /><category term="ginger rogers" label="ginger rogers"
 /><category term="katharine hepburn" label="katharine hepburn"
 /><category term="movies" label="movies"
 /><category term="stage door" label="stage door"
 /><category term="vivacious lady" label="vivacious lady"
 /><content type="xhtml"
><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
>
<img alt="ginger_rogers_kittyf.jpg" src="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/03/25/ginger_rogers_kittyf.jpg" width="209" height="266" /> Ginger Rogers is 
<a href="http://www.tcm.com/thismonth/article/?cid=289980">Star of the Month</a> on TCM right now, and last night I watched three of her movies back-to-back. She made them all in the same 2-3 year period when she and Fred Astaire were taking a little break from each other: 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0030944/">
<em>Vivacious Lady</em> (1938)</a> In which a straight-laced professor marries a nightclub performer on a whim, then can't figure out how to break the news to his parents. 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0031067/">
<em>Bachelor Mother</em> (1939)</a> In which shopgirl Ginger gets mistaken for the mother of an abandoned baby and is stuck keeping him (or else she loses her job--classic 1930s film logic). 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0029604/">
<em>Stage Door</em> (1937)</a> In which a bunch of aspiring actresses live in a boarding house together and fight and cry and sing and persecute each other and jump out of windows and things. What struck me, settling in at 8pm to watch 
<em>Vivacious Lady</em> (which I've seen many times and even written about 
<a href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2009/07/12/reviews_musicals">here</a>) and then being glued to the screen until 
<em>Stage Door</em> ended at ten to one, was how funny Ginger was. If you hear discussion of her today, it's all about dancing and Astaire, which really doesn't do justice to how multi-faceted a performer she was. I mean, there's no denying that she was an incredibly talented dancer. She dances in all three of the above movies, too, I guess because the logic was, if you're hiring Ginger Rogers you might as well get 'a number' out of her. But it seems like most people, if they know her at all, know her as "and Ginger" and that's a shame. (But then I never really liked Astaire anyway, sorry! 
<a href="http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/flickgrrl/The_Great_Debate_Fred_Astaire_v_Gene_Kelly.html">I'm more of a Gene Kelly girl</a>.) She had such great comedic chops, though. She's a goofball in 
<em>Vivacious Lady</em>, kind of hapless in 
<em>Bachelor Mother</em>, but she really owns 
<em>Stage Door</em> for me--opposite Katharine Hepburn! 
<img alt="Hepburn,-Katharine-(Stage-Door)_01-788209.jpg" src="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/03/25/Hepburn,-Katharine-(Stage-Door)_01-788209.jpg" width="302" height="400" /> (Also notice Lucille Ball, then a little-known brunette.) Rogers plays the seasoned veteran of the wannabe-actresses; she knows all the tricks, and she has no patience for idealists like Hepburn's character. She smirks, she snipes, she has an affair with a stage producer and then tells him off when he tries to trade her in for a new girl. Hepburn's character does something morally questionable, and Rogers gives her the coldest cut-you-down-to-size speech ever. Also, at one point, she has this exchange:
<blockquote>Jean (Rogers, commenting on a housemate's fur coat): Say, I think it's very unselfish of those little animals to give up their lives to keep other animals warm.
<br />
<br />Linda (Gail Patrick): You know, they're very smart little animals. They never give up their lives for the 
<em>wrong people</em>.
<br />
<br />Jean: Well, you understand the rodent family much better than I do.</blockquote>While watching the mini-marathon, I was trying to think of a modern actress who exemplifies everything that Ginger could do. There are actresses out there today who can sing and dance competently, and there are actresses who are brilliant comedians, but I can't think of anybody who did both so well. I think Stage Door might be the perfect role for Ginger, actually--she gets to play comedy, drama and chorus line all in one movie, plus there's no man in there to steal the credit! Also, searching Google for a Ginger Rogers pic, look what I found: 
<a href="http://www.classicfilmboy.com/">a classic film blog</a>! He does an 
<a href="http://www.classicfilmboy.com/2010/03/audrey-of-month.html">"Audrey of the Month"</a>.</div
></content
><author
><name
>Erin Wolverton</name
><email
>erin.wolverton@case.edu</email
><uri
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal</uri
></author
></entry
><entry
><title
>Movie Reviews: Listmania edition</title
><link href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/03/19/movie_reviews_listmania_edition"
 /><id
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/03/19/movie_reviews_listmania_edition</id
><published
>2010-03-19T17:21:05Z</published
><updated
>2010-10-04T00:27:44Z</updated
><category term="a death in the family" label="a death in the family"
 /><category term="a hard day's night" label="a hard day's night"
 /><category term="albert finney" label="albert finney"
 /><category term="american film institute" label="american film institute"
 /><category term="anna karenina" label="anna karenina"
 /><category term="ball of fire" label="ball of fire"
 /><category term="barbara stanwyck" label="barbara stanwyck"
 /><category term="barbra streisand" label="barbra streisand"
 /><category term="bette davis" label="bette davis"
 /><category term="british film institute" label="british film institute"
 /><category term="buster keaton" label="buster keaton"
 /><category term="camille" label="camille"
 /><category term="charles dickens" label="charles dickens"
 /><category term="charles laughton" label="charles laughton"
 /><category term="charlie chaplin" label="charlie chaplin"
 /><category term="citizen kane" label="citizen kane"
 /><category term="david lean" label="david lean"
 /><category term="edmond o'brien" label="edmond o'brien"
 /><category term="ethan hawke" label="ethan hawke"
 /><category term="friends (tv)" label="friends (tv)"
 /><category term="funny girl" label="funny girl"
 /><category term="gary cooper" label="gary cooper"
 /><category term="gone with the wind" label="gone with the wind"
 /><category term="great expectations (1946)" label="great expectations (1946)"
 /><category term="great expectations (1998)" label="great expectations (1998)"
 /><category term="great expectations (novel)" label="great expectations (novel)"
 /><category term="greta garbo" label="greta garbo"
 /><category term="henry fonda" label="henry fonda"
 /><category term="howard lloyd" label="howard lloyd"
 /><category term="it's a gift" label="it's a gift"
 /><category term="james agee" label="james agee"
 /><category term="james cagney" label="james cagney"
 /><category term="jezebel" label="jezebel"
 /><category term="marx brothers" label="marx brothers"
 /><category term="mata hari" label="mata hari"
 /><category term="movies" label="movies"
 /><category term="omar sharif" label="omar sharif"
 /><category term="orson welles" label="orson welles"
 /><category term="preston sturges" label="preston sturges"
 /><category term="robert mitchum" label="robert mitchum"
 /><category term="rolling stone" label="rolling stone"
 /><category term="sideshow bob" label="sideshow bob"
 /><category term="summer movie watch" label="summer movie watch"
 /><category term="sunset boulevard" label="sunset boulevard"
 /><category term="the beatles" label="the beatles"
 /><category term="the freshman" label="the freshman"
 /><category term="the lady eve" label="the lady eve"
 /><category term="the night of the hunter" label="the night of the hunter"
 /><category term="the private life of henry viii" label="the private life of henry viii"
 /><category term="the simpsons" label="the simpsons"
 /><category term="tom jones (1963)" label="tom jones (1963)"
 /><category term="tom jones (novel)" label="tom jones (novel)"
 /><category term="twilight" label="twilight"
 /><category term="w.c. fields" label="w.c. fields"
 /><category term="white heat" label="white heat"
 /><content type="xhtml"
><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
>
<strong>So last summer, I decided to run through the 
<a href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/summer_movie_watch/index">AFI 100 Best Movies lists</a>. There are several other AFI lists, among them 
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AFI%27s_100_Years%E2%80%A6100_Thrills">100 Best Thrillers</a>, 
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AFI%27s_100_Years%E2%80%A6100_Passions">100 Best Romances</a>, 
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AFI%27s_100_Years%E2%80%A6100_Laughs">100 Best Comedies</a>, 
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AFI%27s_Greatest_Movie_Musicals">25 Best Musicals</a> (the AFI was tiring at that point, I guess?) and so on. Here are some recent cross-offs.</strong> 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0025318/">
<em>It&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s a Gift</em> (1934)</a> AFI 100 Best Comedies # 58 Of all those lists, which I am always keeping track of, the Best Comedies is the one that appeals to me the least. Movies like It&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s a Gift are why. Some old comedies are just not that funny anymore. Forgive me. W.C. Fields, in this movie, did not make me laugh, he made me bored. (The Marx brothers I also found atrociously unfunny, though as a peace offering, I present Chaplin and Keaton. Those dudes are still funny in 2010.) (Howard Lloyd, too. See below.) There was also a certain tone to this movie&#226;&#8364;&#8221;harried suburban dad type thing&#226;&#8364;&#8221;which bugged me intensely. See the opening scene, where Fields is desperately trying to get to his bathroom mirror for a shave but his kids keep swooping in and getting in his way. The audience is supposed to be laughing at his frustration, but I&#226;&#8364;&#8482;m like &#226;&#8364;&#339;JUST TELL THEM YOU WERE THERE FIRST. OR SAY &#226;&#8364;&#732;I&#226;&#8364;&#8482;M THE DAD, THAT&#226;&#8364;&#8482;S WHY.&#226;&#8364;&#8482; OR SOMETHING.&#226;&#8364; It&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s kind of a common theme in movies, especially comedies: men who are so put-upon by their children and their harpy wives. I don&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t like that theme when it happens today, but I especially can&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t stomach it coming from the 1930s. I just have trouble feeling sorry for a guy whose mother couldn&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t legally vote, whose wife could get arrested for buying birth control, and whose daughter can&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t wear pants to school. 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0015841/">
<em>The Freshman</em> (1925)</a> AFI 100 Best Comedies # 79 So this one, unlike the W.C. Fields movie, was hilarious. I sat there watching it really late one night, just giggling helplessly. It&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s a silent film, starring Harold Lloyd, and he plays a guy going off to college who has a lot of weird ideas about how he&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s going to make friends. For example, every time he introduces himself to somebody, he does a little dance. He thinks this works. The intertitles (in silent films, those little cutaways to dialogue and necessary description) are clever and smirky. The college Lloyd attends is &#226;&#8364;&#339;Tate University, a large football stadium with a college attached,&#226;&#8364; and so, naturally, Lloyd decides that the thing to do to become popular is to join the football team. There&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s a girl and a bully and this insane scene with a disintegrating tuxedo. At their best, silent comedies are the perfect combination of smart and silly, and (at least in my experience) this is one of the best. 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0033373/">
<em>Ball of Fire</em> (1941)</a> AFI 100 Best Comedies # 92 Very funny love story with Barbara Stanwyck and Gary Cooper. He&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s a straight-arrow linguistics professor who&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s studying American slang, and she&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s a saucy nightclub performer with lots to teach him. He lives with seven other doddery old professors who gawk around Stanwyck like she&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s some delightful new species they&#226;&#8364;&#8482;ve discovered. There&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s sort of a Snow White and the Seven Dwarves-thing going on, plus a mobster-related subplot. Plus Barbara Stanwyck! She&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s awesome. 
<object width="480" height="385">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/SmjnJhotUqw&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" />
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/SmjnJhotUqw&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385" />
</object> Click ahead for many more.</div
></content
><author
><name
>Erin Wolverton</name
><email
>erin.wolverton@case.edu</email
><uri
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal</uri
></author
></entry
><entry
><title
>The Best Actress Fallacy</title
><link href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/03/11/the_best_actress_fallacy"
 /><id
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/03/11/the_best_actress_fallacy</id
><published
>2010-03-12T04:15:28Z</published
><updated
>2010-10-04T00:31:53Z</updated
><category term="all about eve" label="all about eve"
 /><category term="all about steve" label="all about steve"
 /><category term="annie hall" label="annie hall"
 /><category term="awards" label="awards"
 /><category term="bette davis" label="bette davis"
 /><category term="born yesterday" label="born yesterday"
 /><category term="cabaret" label="cabaret"
 /><category term="charlize theron" label="charlize theron"
 /><category term="diane keaton" label="diane keaton"
 /><category term="driving miss daisy" label="driving miss daisy"
 /><category term="elizabeth taylor" label="elizabeth taylor"
 /><category term="faye dunaway" label="faye dunaway"
 /><category term="geraldine page" label="geraldine page"
 /><category term="ginger rogers" label="ginger rogers"
 /><category term="gloria swanson" label="gloria swanson"
 /><category term="go fug yourself" label="go fug yourself"
 /><category term="gwyneth paltrow" label="gwyneth paltrow"
 /><category term="halle berry" label="halle berry"
 /><category term="helen mirren" label="helen mirren"
 /><category term="hilary swank" label="hilary swank"
 /><category term="ingrid bergman" label="ingrid bergman"
 /><category term="jane fonda" label="jane fonda"
 /><category term="janet gaynor" label="janet gaynor"
 /><category term="jessica tandy" label="jessica tandy"
 /><category term="jodie foster" label="jodie foster"
 /><category term="judy holliday" label="judy holliday"
 /><category term="julia roberts" label="julia roberts"
 /><category term="julie andrews" label="julie andrews"
 /><category term="kate winslet" label="kate winslet"
 /><category term="katharine hepburn" label="katharine hepburn"
 /><category term="kathy bates" label="kathy bates"
 /><category term="liza minnelli" label="liza minnelli"
 /><category term="marie dressler" label="marie dressler"
 /><category term="marion cotillard" label="marion cotillard"
 /><category term="misery" label="misery"
 /><category term="movies" label="movies"
 /><category term="nicole kidman" label="nicole kidman"
 /><category term="oscars" label="oscars"
 /><category term="reese witherspoon" label="reese witherspoon"
 /><category term="sandra bullock" label="sandra bullock"
 /><category term="shirley booth" label="shirley booth"
 /><category term="sunset boulevard" label="sunset boulevard"
 /><category term="the blind side" label="the blind side"
 /><category term="the office" label="the office"
 /><category term="the proposal" label="the proposal"
 /><category term="vogue" label="vogue"
 /><content type="xhtml"
><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
>One of the more controversial Oscar winners from this past weekend was Sandra Bullock. This past summer, her career was seemingly in the toilet thanks to that 
<em>All About Steve</em> fiasco, and then suddenly 
<em>The Proposal</em> made a buck or two (although if my sister didn&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t like it, I do not see what it could possibly have to recommend itself as a romantic comedy). And then this 
<em>The Blind Side</em> thing happened, and somehow her career trajectory veered so crazily in the opposite direction that she&#226;&#8364;&#8221;
<a href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/02/02/congrats_to_sandra_bullock">as predicted</a>&#226;&#8364;&#8221;won a Razzie and an Oscar in the same year. So the question becomes: does Sandra Bullock, mistress of pratfalls and goofiness, big opening weekends and almost supernatural hotness in her mid-forties (
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000113/">YES, REALLY</a>), fit the profile of the Academy Award-winning actress? First, we need to establish what the profile is. There&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s this tendency to think of Oscar winning actresses as grande dames of cinema. Bette Davis in 
<em>All About Eve</em>, for example 
<img alt="bette davis.jpg" src="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/03/11/bette%20davis.jpg" width="204" height="252" /> Or Gloria Swanson in 
<em>Sunset Boulevard</em> 
<img alt="gloria swanson.jpg" src="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/03/11/gloria%20swanson.jpg" width="350" height="238" /> Would it surprise you to discover that both of those women went up for Best Actress in the same year, 1951? And that both of them lost? Who swiped the award from these two women in the prime of life, tackling two of the meatiest roles in Hollywood history? Judy Holliday (age 29) in 
<em>Born Yesterday</em> 
<img alt="judy holliday.jpg" src="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/03/11/judy%20holliday.jpg" width="266" height="218" /> Nothing against Judy--that's a great movie, and her performance is more nuanced than 'dim bulb with a heart of gold.' Although that's a lot of it.</div
></content
><author
><name
>Erin Wolverton</name
><email
>erin.wolverton@case.edu</email
><uri
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal</uri
></author
></entry
><entry
><title
>Two Bittersweet Stories About Roger Ebert</title
><link href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/03/02/two_bittersweet_stories_about_roger_ebert"
 /><id
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/03/02/two_bittersweet_stories_about_roger_ebert</id
><published
>2010-03-03T02:37:18Z</published
><updated
>2010-10-04T00:36:46Z</updated
><category term="TV" label="TV"
 /><category term="chaz ebert" label="chaz ebert"
 /><category term="chris jones" label="chris jones"
 /><category term="deadspin" label="deadspin"
 /><category term="esquire" label="esquire"
 /><category term="movies" label="movies"
 /><category term="roger ebert" label="roger ebert"
 /><category term="the office" label="the office"
 /><category term="twitter accounts of famous people" label="twitter accounts of famous people"
 /><category term="will leitch" label="will leitch"
 /><content type="xhtml"
><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
>
<img alt="Ebert.jpg" src="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/03/02/Ebert.jpg" width="152" height="232" /> Certainly my favorite film critic writing right now is Roger Ebert, who in less than 1000 words can cut a bad movie down to size, or build a pedestal on which a great movie will sit. His health problems of the last few years have had severe effects on his body (robbing him of his voice, notably), but that has only caused him to multiply his writing output. In addition to his reviews, he's 
<a href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/">blogging</a> and philosophizing and 
<a href="http://twitter.com/ebertchicago">even tweeting</a> continually. A few weeks ago, he authorized a cover story to be written about him for 
<em>Esquire</em> magazine, revealing very intimate details of his life as a partial invalid. It's a sad and lovely article, making you feel like you're hanging around in the viewing room with Ebert and his kickass wife, Chaz. 
<a href="http://www.esquire.com/features/roger-ebert-0310">Roger Ebert: The Essential Man</a> (Chris Jones, from 
<em>Esquire</em>) Today, I read another tribute to Ebert, this one of a very different kind. A writer called Will Leitch describes how he idolized Ebert, hugely insulted him in print, and grew to regret it. It's a really compelling tale, with Leitch in full apology mode. Remember that time Ryan on 
<em>The Office</em> excused his past behavior by saying: "I was in my mid-twenties"? That basically sums up Leitch's explanation of his behavior, but he is wise enough as a writer now that the story he wrote here is really about what an unmissable writer Ebert has continued to be despite his ordeals. 
<a href="http://deadspin.com/5482198/my-roger-ebert-story">My Roger Ebert Story</a> (Will Leitch, from 
<em>Deadspin</em>)</div
></content
><author
><name
>Erin Wolverton</name
><email
>erin.wolverton@case.edu</email
><uri
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal</uri
></author
></entry
><entry
><title
>Congrats to Sandra Bullock!</title
><link href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/02/02/congrats_to_sandra_bullock"
 /><id
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/02/02/congrats_to_sandra_bullock</id
><published
>2010-02-03T04:16:45Z</published
><updated
>2010-10-04T00:47:00Z</updated
><category term="all about steve" label="all about steve"
 /><category term="award shows" label="award shows"
 /><category term="inglourious basterds" label="inglourious basterds"
 /><category term="movies" label="movies"
 /><category term="oscars" label="oscars"
 /><category term="sandra bullock" label="sandra bullock"
 /><category term="the blind side" label="the blind side"
 /><content type="xhtml"
><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
>
<img alt="sandra-bullock-6894641.jpg" src="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/02/02/sandra-bullock-6894641.jpg" width="214" height="295" /> She's now in the running for 
<a href="http://oscar-watch.ew.com/2010/02/02/oscar-nominations-announced/">best performance of the year</a> 
<em>and</em> 
<a href="http://oscar-watch.ew.com/2010/02/01/transformers-sandra-bullock-earn-razzie-nominations/">worst performance of the year</a>. I was never gonna see either movie, but now they're just screaming "double feature," aren't they? P.S. Go team 
<em>Inglourious Basterds</em>!</div
></content
><author
><name
>Erin Wolverton</name
><email
>erin.wolverton@case.edu</email
><uri
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal</uri
></author
></entry
><entry
><title
>Movie Reviews: Talented Teens and "Actresses of a Certain Age" edition</title
><link href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/01/29/movie_reviews_talented_teens_and_actresses_of_a_certain_age_edition"
 /><id
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/01/29/movie_reviews_talented_teens_and_actresses_of_a_certain_age_edition</id
><published
>2010-01-30T03:04:53Z</published
><updated
>2010-10-04T00:51:51Z</updated
><category term="alicia silverstone" label="alicia silverstone"
 /><category term="amy adams" label="amy adams"
 /><category term="amy heckerling" label="amy heckerling"
 /><category term="anne sheridan" label="anne sheridan"
 /><category term="clueless" label="clueless"
 /><category term="corey feldman" label="corey feldman"
 /><category term="crossing jordan" label="crossing jordan"
 /><category term="david strathairn" label="david strathairn"
 /><category term="emma" label="emma"
 /><category term="fred willard" label="fred willard"
 /><category term="george brent" label="george brent"
 /><category term="honeymoon for three" label="honeymoon for three"
 /><category term="i could never be your woman" label="i could never be your woman"
 /><category term="jane austen" label="jane austen"
 /><category term="jerry o'connell" label="jerry o'connell"
 /><category term="jude law" label="jude law"
 /><category term="julie and julia" label="julie and julia"
 /><category term="lindsay lohan" label="lindsay lohan"
 /><category term="mean girls" label="mean girls"
 /><category term="meryl streep" label="meryl streep"
 /><category term="michelle pfeiffer" label="michelle pfeiffer"
 /><category term="movies" label="movies"
 /><category term="my blueberry nights" label="my blueberry nights"
 /><category term="natalie portman" label="natalie portman"
 /><category term="netflix instant" label="netflix instant"
 /><category term="norah jones" label="norah jones"
 /><category term="paul rudd" label="paul rudd"
 /><category term="rachel mcadams" label="rachel mcadams"
 /><category term="rachel weisz" label="rachel weisz"
 /><category term="river phoenix" label="river phoenix"
 /><category term="saoirse ronan" label="saoirse ronan"
 /><category term="singin' in the rain" label="singin' in the rain"
 /><category term="stand by me" label="stand by me"
 /><category term="stephen king" label="stephen king"
 /><category term="the river wild" label="the river wild"
 /><category term="tim meadows" label="tim meadows"
 /><category term="tina fey" label="tina fey"
 /><category term="wil wheaton" label="wil wheaton"
 /><content type="xhtml"
><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
>
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0092005/">
<em>Stand by Me</em> (1986)</a> This is kind of sick, but one night I was on Netflix Instant looking for a short movie to watch before bed, and I had read on the Internet that day about a girl who was killed by an Amtrak train. So, uh, I decided to watch 
<em>Stand By Me</em>, a great coming-of-age movie which is about, among other things, kids getting hit and/or almost getting hit by trains. I&#226;&#8364;&#8482;ve never read the Stephen King story on which the movie is based, but I&#226;&#8364;&#8482;ve heard it&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s great. The movie definitely charms with its 50s detail and foul-mouthed little boys. What&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s really distracting, though, is looking at all those young Hollywood actors and thinking about how none of them ended up where people expected. Like, 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0005278/">the fat kid</a> slimmed down, is now a regularly working actor (I may have watched his former show, 
<em>Crossing Jordan</em>, a time or two) married to a former model. The 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000203/">kid who actually seems to have a future as an actor</a> is the one who didn&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t (instead he died from drug addiction). The 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000397/">smartass</a> who was already a pretty big star is in the reality TV doldrums now. I especially like that the kid who, in the movie, grows up to be a writer, actually did. 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000696/">Wil Wheaton</a>, one of the few teen Hollywood success stories. More movies follow!</div
></content
><author
><name
>Erin Wolverton</name
><email
>erin.wolverton@case.edu</email
><uri
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal</uri
></author
></entry
><entry
><title
>Misleading Hope for Inglourious Basterds!</title
><link href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/01/24/misleading_hope_for_inglourious_basterds"
 /><id
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/01/24/misleading_hope_for_inglourious_basterds</id
><published
>2010-01-24T16:36:28Z</published
><updated
>2010-10-04T00:56:05Z</updated
><category term="avatar" label="avatar"
 /><category term="award shows" label="award shows"
 /><category term="awards" label="awards"
 /><category term="golden globes" label="golden globes"
 /><category term="inglourious basterds" label="inglourious basterds"
 /><category term="james cameron" label="james cameron"
 /><category term="movies" label="movies"
 /><category term="quentin tarantino" label="quentin tarantino"
 /><category term="sag awards" label="sag awards"
 /><content type="xhtml"
><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
>
<img alt="inglourious-basterds_pic2_m.jpg" src="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/01/24/inglourious-basterds_pic2_m.jpg" width="342" height="234" /> So, last week 
<a href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/01/19/golden_globes_recap">I wrote about the Golden Globes</a>, and how 
<em>Avatar</em> is going to steal everything from 
<em>Inglourious Basterds</em>. Well, here's the good news: 
<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20100124/ennew_afp/entertainmentusfilmawardsactors_20100124101952">
<em>Inglourious Basterds</em> won the SAG award for Best Ensemble last night</a>! (Because the SAG awards only award performances, the top award is Best Ensemble, the de facto Best Picture.) The movie now has huge momentum heading into the Oscar race. The news that makes it less impressive: 
<em>Avatar</em>, which downplayed actors' performances in favor of sci fi and CGI, 
<a href="http://moviesblog.mtv.com/2009/12/17/avatar-isnt-nominated-for-the-sag-awards-but-does-it-really-matter/">was not nominated</a>. Tarantino's opus beat out four 
<em>other</em> films. More than likely, when Oscar noms are announced (
<a href="http://oscar.go.com/nominations">Tuesday, February 2</a>), it will be 
<em>Avatar</em> and four underdogs. If 
<em>Inglourious Basterds</em> is one of them, I'll be rooting for its unlikely victory.</div
></content
><author
><name
>Erin Wolverton</name
><email
>erin.wolverton@case.edu</email
><uri
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal</uri
></author
></entry
><entry
><title
>Golden Globes Recap</title
><link href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/01/19/golden_globes_recap"
 /><id
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/01/19/golden_globes_recap</id
><published
>2010-01-20T01:21:50Z</published
><updated
>2010-10-04T01:08:12Z</updated
><category term="30 rock" label="30 rock"
 /><category term="TV" label="TV"
 /><category term="alec baldwin" label="alec baldwin"
 /><category term="avatar" label="avatar"
 /><category term="award shows" label="award shows"
 /><category term="awards" label="awards"
 /><category term="chris march" label="chris march"
 /><category term="christian siriano" label="christian siriano"
 /><category term="christina hendricks" label="christina hendricks"
 /><category term="christoph waltz" label="christoph waltz"
 /><category term="clothes" label="clothes"
 /><category term="crazy heart" label="crazy heart"
 /><category term="dexter" label="dexter"
 /><category term="elisabeth moss" label="elisabeth moss"
 /><category term="fergie" label="fergie"
 /><category term="gabourey sidibe" label="gabourey sidibe"
 /><category term="glee" label="glee"
 /><category term="glenn close" label="glenn close"
 /><category term="go fug yourself" label="go fug yourself"
 /><category term="golden globes" label="golden globes"
 /><category term="inglourious basterds" label="inglourious basterds"
 /><category term="james cameron" label="james cameron"
 /><category term="jane krakowski" label="jane krakowski"
 /><category term="january jones" label="january jones"
 /><category term="jeff bridges" label="jeff bridges"
 /><category term="jennifer garner" label="jennifer garner"
 /><category term="john lithgow" label="john lithgow"
 /><category term="judd apatow" label="judd apatow"
 /><category term="julianna margulies" label="julianna margulies"
 /><category term="julie and julia" label="julie and julia"
 /><category term="kristin bell" label="kristin bell"
 /><category term="lauren graham" label="lauren graham"
 /><category term="mad men" label="mad men"
 /><category term="mariah carey" label="mariah carey"
 /><category term="martin scorsese" label="martin scorsese"
 /><category term="meryl streep" label="meryl streep"
 /><category term="michael c. hall" label="michael c. hall"
 /><category term="movies" label="movies"
 /><category term="oscars" label="oscars"
 /><category term="penelope cruz" label="penelope cruz"
 /><category term="project runway" label="project runway"
 /><category term="quentin tarantino" label="quentin tarantino"
 /><category term="raging bull" label="raging bull"
 /><category term="robert downey jr." label="robert downey jr."
 /><category term="rose byrne" label="rose byrne"
 /><category term="sally field" label="sally field"
 /><category term="sandra bullock" label="sandra bullock"
 /><category term="sherlock holmes" label="sherlock holmes"
 /><category term="taxi driver" label="taxi driver"
 /><category term="the 40-year-old virgin" label="the 40-year-old virgin"
 /><category term="the age of innocence" label="the age of innocence"
 /><category term="the hangover" label="the hangover"
 /><category term="tina fey" label="tina fey"
 /><category term="toni colette" label="toni colette"
 /><category term="up" label="up"
 /><category term="up in the air" label="up in the air"
 /><category term="vera farmiga" label="vera farmiga"
 /><content type="xhtml"
><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
>
<img alt="golden-globe.jpg" src="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/01/19/golden-globe.jpg" width="189" height="240" /> This will be shorter and less detailed than my usual next-day awards show extravaganza. I had family visiting this weekend, and both my mom and aunt joined me for the Globes viewing, so we were able to crack jokes and comment on the clothes in real time, which sort of took away some of the excitement of doing it here. What can I say? SO SORRY INTERNET. 
<a href="http://www.oscars.org/awards/academyawards/index.html">We still have the Oscars.</a></div
></content
><author
><name
>Erin Wolverton</name
><email
>erin.wolverton@case.edu</email
><uri
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal</uri
></author
></entry
><entry
><title
>How Signs is Both Awesome and Misunderstood</title
><link href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/01/04/how_signs_is_both_awesome_and_misunderstood"
 /><id
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/01/04/how_signs_is_both_awesome_and_misunderstood</id
><published
>2010-01-04T05:33:01Z</published
><updated
>2010-10-04T01:13:44Z</updated
><category term="bruce almighty" label="bruce almighty"
 /><category term="dogma" label="dogma"
 /><category term="entertainment weekly" label="entertainment weekly"
 /><category term="evan almighty" label="evan almighty"
 /><category term="it's a wonderful life" label="it's a wonderful life"
 /><category term="lord of the rings" label="lord of the rings"
 /><category term="m. night shyamalan" label="m. night shyamalan"
 /><category term="mel gibson" label="mel gibson"
 /><category term="movies" label="movies"
 /><category term="religion" label="religion"
 /><category term="signs" label="signs"
 /><category term="splash" label="splash"
 /><category term="the sixth sense" label="the sixth sense"
 /><content type="xhtml"
><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
>
<img alt="signs.jpg" src="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/01/05/signs.jpg" width="309" height="246" /> I turned on the TV on Saturday night to see that 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0286106/">
<em>Signs</em>
</a> was about ten minutes from being over on TNT. I was so disappointed at having missed the thing that I threw the DVD on, utterly spur-of-the-moment. I LOVE 
<em>Signs</em>. And yet, many people are frustrated with or critical of this movie. I remember when it came out, people in my college dorms were complaining about it and people in the breakroom at the department store where I worked were complaining about it. It suffered from comparisons to 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0167404/">
<em>The Sixth Sense</em>
</a>, the movie its writer/director, M. Night Shyamalan, made first, although I think it&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s at least as accomplished as that one. Here, then, is my answer to the common criticisms of 
<em>Signs</em>.</div
></content
><author
><name
>Erin Wolverton</name
><email
>erin.wolverton@case.edu</email
><uri
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal</uri
></author
></entry
><entry
><title
>30 Before 30 (Six Month Progress Update), Part 1</title
><link href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2009/12/29/30_before_30_six_month_progress_update_part_1"
 /><id
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2009/12/29/30_before_30_six_month_progress_update_part_1</id
><published
>2009-12-30T03:04:46Z</published
><updated
>2010-10-04T01:19:54Z</updated
><category term="30 before 30" label="30 before 30"
 /><category term="accomplishments" label="accomplishments"
 /><category term="activism" label="activism"
 /><category term="allan gurganus" label="allan gurganus"
 /><category term="beloved" label="beloved"
 /><category term="bob dylan" label="bob dylan"
 /><category term="books" label="books"
 /><category term="clothes" label="clothes"
 /><category term="coldplay" label="coldplay"
 /><category term="css" label="css"
 /><category term="fun outings" label="fun outings"
 /><category term="furniture" label="furniture"
 /><category term="goals" label="goals"
 /><category term="hilary mantel" label="hilary mantel"
 /><category term="issues" label="issues"
 /><category term="joni mitchell" label="joni mitchell"
 /><category term="kate atkinson" label="kate atkinson"
 /><category term="kazuo ishiguro" label="kazuo ishiguro"
 /><category term="michael chabon" label="michael chabon"
 /><category term="money" label="money"
 /><category term="movies" label="movies"
 /><category term="parties" label="parties"
 /><category term="phoenix" label="phoenix"
 /><category term="restaurants" label="restaurants"
 /><category term="rilo kiley" label="rilo kiley"
 /><category term="sula" label="sula"
 /><category term="summer movie watch" label="summer movie watch"
 /><category term="the bravery" label="the bravery"
 /><category term="the killers" label="the killers"
 /><category term="therapy" label="therapy"
 /><category term="toni morrison" label="toni morrison"
 /><category term="vampire weekend" label="vampire weekend"
 /><category term="web stuff" label="web stuff"
 /><category term="yeah yeah yeahs" label="yeah yeah yeahs"
 /><content type="xhtml"
><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
>
<img alt="achievement.jpg" src="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2009/12/29/achievement.jpg" width="400" height="267" /> Just over one month late! Tee hee. Back in May, 
<a href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2009/05/23/30_before_30">I established a 30 Before 30 list</a>, tasks I aspired to accomplish within two years. I'm sure everyone's been wondering how I have doing on this, and so, over a fourth of a way through my allotted time, here is (the first half of) my update! Click ahead for completed and half-completed items! Check back soon for not-completed and modified items.</div
></content
><author
><name
>Erin Wolverton</name
><email
>erin.wolverton@case.edu</email
><uri
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal</uri
></author
></entry
><entry
><title
>Movie Reviews: No School in December! edition</title
><link href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2009/12/24/movie_reviews_no_school_in_december_edition"
 /><id
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2009/12/24/movie_reviews_no_school_in_december_edition</id
><published
>2009-12-25T00:31:59Z</published
><updated
>2010-10-04T01:24:17Z</updated
><category term="Brandon" label="Brandon"
 /><category term="allison janney" label="allison janney"
 /><category term="amy adams" label="amy adams"
 /><category term="ashley judd" label="ashley judd"
 /><category term="black orpheus" label="black orpheus"
 /><category term="citizen kane" label="citizen kane"
 /><category term="david carradine" label="david carradine"
 /><category term="dexter" label="dexter"
 /><category term="donal logue" label="donal logue"
 /><category term="ellen degeneres" label="ellen degeneres"
 /><category term="emily blunt" label="emily blunt"
 /><category term="faye dunaway" label="faye dunaway"
 /><category term="finding nemo" label="finding nemo"
 /><category term="frank sinatra" label="frank sinatra"
 /><category term="gilda" label="gilda"
 /><category term="greer garson" label="greer garson"
 /><category term="harvey keitel" label="harvey keitel"
 /><category term="james mason" label="james mason"
 /><category term="janet leigh" label="janet leigh"
 /><category term="keith carradine" label="keith carradine"
 /><category term="kill bill" label="kill bill"
 /><category term="little miss sunshine" label="little miss sunshine"
 /><category term="little women" label="little women"
 /><category term="lolita (movie)" label="lolita (movie)"
 /><category term="movies" label="movies"
 /><category term="mythology" label="mythology"
 /><category term="nashville" label="nashville"
 /><category term="natalie portman" label="natalie portman"
 /><category term="orson welles" label="orson welles"
 /><category term="out of sight" label="out of sight"
 /><category term="random harvest" label="random harvest"
 /><category term="ridley scott" label="ridley scott"
 /><category term="rita hayworth" label="rita hayworth"
 /><category term="robert redford" label="robert redford"
 /><category term="ronald colman" label="ronald colman"
 /><category term="stanley kubrick" label="stanley kubrick"
 /><category term="sue lyon" label="sue lyon"
 /><category term="sunshine cleaning" label="sunshine cleaning"
 /><category term="susan sarandon" label="susan sarandon"
 /><category term="the duellists" label="the duellists"
 /><category term="the lady from shanghai" label="the lady from shanghai"
 /><category term="the manchurian candidate (original)" label="the manchurian candidate (original)"
 /><category term="the manchurian candidate (remake)" label="the manchurian candidate (remake)"
 /><category term="three days of the condor" label="three days of the condor"
 /><category term="touch of evil" label="touch of evil"
 /><category term="wal-mart" label="wal-mart"
 /><category term="where the heart is" label="where the heart is"
 /><category term="winona ryder" label="winona ryder"
 /><content type="xhtml"
><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
>
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0862846/">
<em>Sunshine Cleaning</em> (2008)</a> A pretty modest comedy from the producers of 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0449059/">
<em>Little Miss Sunshine</em>
</a>, which suffers from the comparison, and from being a bit too miserable to really be funny. Still, there are great performances from Amy Adams and Emily Blunt. 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0035238/">
<em>Random Harvest</em> (1942)</a> So you have Greer Garson and Ronald Colman. She&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s a life-affirming singer, and he&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s an amnesiac fresh off the boat from World War 1. They fall in love, get married, and have a baby. Maybe you can guess what happens next, or maybe you can&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t. But it&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s TRAGIC. IT&#226;&#8364;&#8482;S 1940s ERA TRAGIC, which is second only to 1950s era tragic. I&#226;&#8364;&#8482;ve been seeing a lot of tearjerkers lately, but this one was above-average.</div
></content
><author
><name
>Erin Wolverton</name
><email
>erin.wolverton@case.edu</email
><uri
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal</uri
></author
></entry
><entry
><title
>Ralph speaks for me</title
><link href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2009/12/19/ralph_speaks_for_me"
 /><id
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2009/12/19/ralph_speaks_for_me</id
><published
>2009-12-20T02:58:06Z</published
><updated
>2010-10-04T01:26:29Z</updated
><category term="if I do say so myself..." label="if I do say so myself..."
 /><category term="mean girls" label="mean girls"
 /><category term="movies" label="movies"
 /><category term="ralph wiggum" label="ralph wiggum"
 /><category term="the night of the hunter" label="the night of the hunter"
 /><category term="the simpsons" label="the simpsons"
 /><content type="xhtml"
><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
>
<img alt="wiggum special.jpg" src="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2009/12/19/wiggum%20special.jpg" width="150" height="150" /> Well, do you know anyone 
<em>else</em> who started off their Saturday evening with a repeat viewing of 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0377092/">
<em>Mean Girls</em>
</a> and then segued seamlessly into 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0048424/">
<em>The Night of the Hunter</em>
</a>? I didn't 
<em>think</em> so.</div
></content
><author
><name
>Erin Wolverton</name
><email
>erin.wolverton@case.edu</email
><uri
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal</uri
></author
></entry
><entry
><title
>Movie Reviews: Holiday Weekend Edition!</title
><link href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2009/12/09/movie_reviews_holiday_weekend_edition"
 /><id
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2009/12/09/movie_reviews_holiday_weekend_edition</id
><published
>2009-12-10T03:07:09Z</published
><updated
>2010-10-04T01:32:16Z</updated
><category term="adrien brody" label="adrien brody"
 /><category term="anjelica huston" label="anjelica huston"
 /><category term="bill nighy" label="bill nighy"
 /><category term="devotchka" label="devotchka"
 /><category term="diane court" label="diane court"
 /><category term="emma thompson" label="emma thompson"
 /><category term="film class" label="film class"
 /><category term="four christmases" label="four christmases"
 /><category term="frasier" label="frasier"
 /><category term="happy-go-lucky" label="happy-go-lucky"
 /><category term="holidays" label="holidays"
 /><category term="i love you man!" label="i love you man!"
 /><category term="jason schwartzman" label="jason schwartzman"
 /><category term="jason segel" label="jason segel"
 /><category term="katie holmes" label="katie holmes"
 /><category term="laura linney" label="laura linney"
 /><category term="little miss sunshine" label="little miss sunshine"
 /><category term="lloyd dobler" label="lloyd dobler"
 /><category term="love actually" label="love actually"
 /><category term="movies" label="movies"
 /><category term="owen wilson" label="owen wilson"
 /><category term="patricia clarkson" label="patricia clarkson"
 /><category term="paul rudd" label="paul rudd"
 /><category term="pieces of april" label="pieces of april"
 /><category term="rashida jones" label="rashida jones"
 /><category term="reese witherspoon" label="reese witherspoon"
 /><category term="sans soleil" label="sans soleil"
 /><category term="say anything" label="say anything"
 /><category term="thanksgiving" label="thanksgiving"
 /><category term="the darjeeling limited" label="the darjeeling limited"
 /><category term="vince vaughn" label="vince vaughn"
 /><category term="wendy and lucy" label="wendy and lucy"
 /><category term="wes anderson" label="wes anderson"
 /><content type="xhtml"
><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
>Thanksgiving is a movie-loving time. 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0369436/">
<em>Four Christmases</em> (2008)</a> I mostly watched this under duress; it was playing at my parents' house on Thanksgiving Day, and to avoid it I would have had to leave. I don't really want to review these kinds of movies, because it just seems petty--I mostly hated it, yeah, but I knew that it wasn't made for me, it was made for someone who finds people getting slammed into the floor and kicked in the balls and whatnot hilarious. For someone who isn't totally fed up with the "uptight woman who loves her independence secretly wants a baby of own; she didn't even know it until she saw the negative pregnancy test" trope. Also for someone who can suspend belief enough to think that someone as aggressively uptight as Reese Witherspoon is a good match for a laid-back wiseass like Vince Vaughn (I like both actors and I think they are both capable of really good performances, but they so do not belong together). On the positive side, there were some great actors of a previous generation playing the four parents, the best of which was Sissy Spacek, who also had an awesome artist's colony house. Click ahead for more! Many are holiday-themed.</div
></content
><author
><name
>Erin Wolverton</name
><email
>erin.wolverton@case.edu</email
><uri
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal</uri
></author
></entry
><entry
><title
>The Twilight Phenomenon</title
><link href="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2009/12/01/the_twilight_phenomenon"
 /><id
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2009/12/01/the_twilight_phenomenon</id
><published
>2009-12-02T03:40:56Z</published
><updated
>2010-10-04T01:37:16Z</updated
><category term="books" label="books"
 /><category term="bram stoker's dracula" label="bram stoker's dracula"
 /><category term="movies" label="movies"
 /><category term="pride and prejudice" label="pride and prejudice"
 /><category term="sling blog" label="sling blog"
 /><category term="supernatural" label="supernatural"
 /><category term="twilight" label="twilight"
 /><category term="wuthering heights" label="wuthering heights"
 /><content type="xhtml"
><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
>
<img alt="twilight.jpg" src="http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2009/12/01/twilight.jpg" width="271" height="220" /> Can I talk for a minute myself about 
<a href="http://www.thetwilightsaga.com/">the 
<em>Twilight</em> phenomenon</a>? You might have heard that 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1259571/">
<em>New Moon</em>
</a> is 
<a href="http://www.metacritic.com/film/weekendboxoffice.shtml">kicking ass at the box office</a>, thanks to the expendable incomes of both 14-year-old girls and their 45-year-old mothers. You might also have heard that the movies are adaptations of an adolescent book series. I have not read these books. I&#226;&#8364;&#8482;m not particularly interested in reading the books. I&#226;&#8364;&#8482;m not a huge fan of the vampire thing anyway&#226;&#8364;&#8221;I love Gothicism, but as it happens I&#226;&#8364;&#8482;m more about ghosts and haunted houses, although I will grant that Bram Stoker&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s 
<em>Dracula</em> is actually really good&#226;&#8364;&#8221;and the romance element of it means nothing to me. I have never read romance novels, and again, I&#226;&#8364;&#8482;m not particularly interested in starting. On the other hand, I know a lot of people who have read the 
<em>Twilight</em> books, both people in real life and people in literature forums online whose opinions I trust. Most of them acknowledge that the writing is a bit amateur, but that the stories are undeniable page-turners. The literary equivalent of a TV crime procedural. 
<em>Twilight and Order</em>. 
<em>CSI: Forks, WA</em>. Although I don&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t like it when people want to compare guilty pleasure reading with canonical literature (&#226;&#8364;&#339;oh, 
<em>Twilight</em> is just as good as 
<em>Pride and Prejudice</em>, you&#226;&#8364;&#8482;re just being a snob about it&#226;&#8364;), I don&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t have fundamental issues with people who want to float around in the guilty pleasure camp indefinitely. There are a lot of corners of my life in which I unapologetically take it easy. Besides, one thing that is emphatically in the 
<em>Twilight</em> series&#226;&#8364;&#8482; favor&#226;&#8364;&#8221;which can also be said for the Harry Potter series, which I have also not read&#226;&#8364;&#8221;is that it appeals to people who are in general non-readers, and this, I would never quibble with. Reading is like pot&#226;&#8364;&#8221;it&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s a gateway drug! The more you do of it, the more you want to do it. (P.S., Mom, I speak hypothetically having never smoked pot.) If some fourteen-year-old girl wants to read 
<em>Twilight</em> from cover to cover and then tentatively graduate on to 
<em>Wuthering Heights</em>? I want to encourage her to do so. (Even if she doesn&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t move beyond 
<em>Twilight</em>, at least it&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s a couple hours she won&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t spend watching 
<em>The Real Housewives of Atlanta</em>, know what I&#226;&#8364;&#8482;m saying?) One question I&#226;&#8364;&#8482;ve been entertaining myself with is whether I would have been one of those 
<em>Twilight</em> obsessives if it had come out ten years earlier, or fifteen, or twenty. Looking back, completely clear-eyed, taking into consideration the goofy stuff I liked at various ages, I think I can honestly state that by fourteen or fifteen I would have been too old for 
<em>Twilight</em>. I had already started reading really good stuff by that age, and even though you can graduate on to 
<em>Wuthering Heights</em> from 
<em>Twilight</em>, I don&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t think that you can go backwards. I don&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t want to play like I&#226;&#8364;&#8482;m too cool for 
<em>Twilight</em>, though, because I really don&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t think that&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s the case. I watched 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0460681/">
<em>Supernatural</em>
</a> for two seasons because the brothers were hotties. And those airdates won&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t lie, either; I was indeed in my twenties at the time. As a preteen I swooned over many a piece of even more ridiculous tripe. Had 
<em>Twilight</em> been placed into my hands around age twelve? Yeah, I think I would&#226;&#8364;&#8482;ve fallen for it. I will say this much: I am glad that I am a grown-up now and not feeling peer pressure to turn on to 
<em>Twilight</em>. One night I happened upon the 
<a href="http://www.cracked.com/funny-36-twilight/">Cracked.com complete series recap</a>. I was not aware of the actual plots of these books&#226;&#8364;&#8221;especially the later ones&#226;&#8364;&#8221;and when I read this for the first time I was utterly shocked. Understand that if you read this, you may have an extreme reaction, such as bleeding out of the ears. (I am not kidding. Prepare yourself.) In case that was too graphic for you, try this: the hilariously embittered commentary of Will and Tara at Sling Blog (who every week see the #1 movie of the previous weekend).
<blockquote>
<strong>11:40:56AM Will Edmondson</strong>: I mean, if there's anything to be said in defense of the movie, it's that it definitely knows its audience, and it appeals to that audience. The problem is: that audience is not something that I want to admit exists.</blockquote>
<a href="http://www.sling.com/blog/6135/%22The-Twilight-Saga%3A-New-Moon%22%3A-From-the-Bullpen">Read the rest here</a>.</div
></content
><author
><name
>Erin Wolverton</name
><email
>erin.wolverton@case.edu</email
><uri
>http://blog.case.edu/cereal</uri
></author
></entry
></feed
>
