Blog@Case Topics: singin' in the rainhttp://blog.case.edu/topics/singin'%20in%20the%20rainErin Wolvertonerin.wolverton@case.eduhttp://blog.case.edu/cereal2010-10-04T00:51:51ZMovie Reviews: Talented Teens and "Actresses of a Certain Age" editionhttp://blog.case.edu/cereal/2010/01/29/movie_reviews_talented_teens_and_actresses_of_a_certain_age_edition2010-01-30T03:04:53Z2010-10-04T00:51:51Z
Stand by Me (1986) This is kind of sick, but one night I was on Netflix Instant looking for a short movie to watch before bed, and I had read on the Internet that day about a girl who was killed by an Amtrak train. So, uh, I decided to watch Stand By Me, a great coming-of-age movie which is about, among other things, kids getting hit and/or almost getting hit by trains. I’ve never read the Stephen King story on which the movie is based, but I’ve heard it’s great. The movie definitely charms with its 50s detail and foul-mouthed little boys. What’s really distracting, though, is looking at all those young Hollywood actors and thinking about how none of them ended up where people expected. Like, the fat kid slimmed down, is now a regularly working actor (I may have watched his former show, Crossing Jordan, a time or two) married to a former model. The kid who actually seems to have a future as an actor is the one who didn’t (instead he died from drug addiction). The smartass who was already a pretty big star is in the reality TV doldrums now. I especially like that the kid who, in the movie, grows up to be a writer, actually did. Wil Wheaton, one of the few teen Hollywood success stories. More movies follow!
Erin Wolvertonerin.wolverton@case.eduhttp://blog.case.edu/cerealMovie reviews: More Stuff I've Seen Latelyhttp://blog.case.edu/cereal/2009/11/28/movie_reviews_more_stuff_ive_seen_lately2009-11-28T05:23:48Z2010-10-04T01:40:15Z
Buster Keaton Shorts (1920-1922) The program was One Week , The Play House and Cops , and One Week was my favorite. Silent films often impress me with how epic they are; it's easy to think of old movies as stagy, cramped drawing-room type stories with tons of talk and not a lot of moving around, because that's the kind of movies that were popular in the 1930s. The reason for that was that sound recording systems were still pretty primitive and the actors couldn't move around much (see Singin' in the Rain for a reenactment). For silent films though, before sound was an issue, they were going wild, having car chases, destroying houses. Have you ever seen Keaton in The General ? The guy is jumping from one train to another like he's in Die Hard . And it's funny, too, totally deadpan. Watch One Week below, courtesy of Google video, and enjoy. More reviews after the jump, some spoilery!
Erin Wolvertonerin.wolverton@case.eduhttp://blog.case.edu/cerealMy God, Did You See That?http://blog.case.edu/cereal/2009/11/22/my_god_did_you_see_that2009-11-22T15:19:53Z2010-10-04T01:43:11Z
Untitled.jpg I've missed the last few weeks of Saturday Night Live, but I tuned in last night simply because I happened to finish a book right around 11:30. I'm glad I saw this episode because host Joseph Gordon-Levitt kinda brought the house down. (In case the name's not familiar, or that picture's too small, he was the kid on 3rd Rock from the Sun; now he's 28 and making indie films. The Lookout was good; I hear Brick is great but it's been in my queue for about three years.) It's a pretty regular occurrence for hosts to sing and dance in their monologue; Gordon-Levitt chose to emulate the "Make 'Em Laugh" number from Singin' in the Rain. If you have seen that movie, you know the insane physicality involved. If you watched the show, you know that he 95% pulled it off, and that's an incredible achievement. This link to an Entertainment Weekly recap helpfully provides clips of both Gordon-Levitt's number as well as the original from Donald O'Connor. The writer of the recap, Ken Tucker, is very crotchety about the whole thing, huffing that he was not impressed because Gordon-Levitt didn't make it look as "effortless" as O'Connor did. Not to deride what O'Connor did back in 1952, but he had a cushion that Gordon-Levitt did not have: edits. Gordon-Levitt did the whole damn thing live! He landed BOTH runs up the wall! So he was huffing and puffing a little by the end. Tucker complains that the thing "wasn't funny," but I think he's missing the point. It wasn't meant to be funny, and it wasn't meant to be better than the original; it was meant to be an incredibly bold gesture by a guy who's just been hovering on the edge of superstardom for the past fifteen or so years, and who I expect will be much-talked about for the rest of the week. It was a calculated move saying, "hey, don't underestimate me," and my prediction is that it will work. (If you want funny, see the last skit of the night, also playable on the EW page. Gordon-Levitt played Lloyd Dobler doing the boombox serenade and Jason Sudeikis played the neighbor who just couldn't stop ruining it with questions. "Hey, whatcha doing? Is that Peter Gabriel?") Anyway, it impressed me. Watch those clips--O'Connor's first, so you know what the standard was, and then Gordon-Levitt's--and tell me you didn't have at least a little bit of admiration for the kid. (Who is, incidentally, exactly my age but still seems like he's twenty, only because he's been on TV since he was like four.)
Erin Wolvertonerin.wolverton@case.eduhttp://blog.case.edu/cereal